It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by darkbluesky
The clown went to that event with two video cameras with the sole intent of making a scene that would result in him being removed.
Originally posted by Copernicus
Im surprised that some people think this treatment is fine. I mean, what if you want to ask a politician something and the police say "step away" in the middle of it? Do you still think you have free speech, and if so, whats your definition of free speech?
Is it really free speech when the police can tell you to stop talking for whatever reason, like "disturbing the peace" or any other bull# reason?
Let me tell you how this would have been handled in Sweden. He would have been allowed to finish his question. The police would not have stepped in since he did not break any laws (we dont consider it "disturbing the peace when somebody talks). The politican would have answered his question. Everything would have been fine.
Personally I think the police in USA arent professional, patient and calm. They look more like a gang of people getting high on the powertrip than anything else to me. Sorry, but thats the way it looks like.
And why are people repeating that USA is a free country? Its becoming more controlled than any other country in the world. You are not free at all, unless free means controlled... I dont know, maybe it does?
Originally posted by Electro38
It is this private corporation's policies that those students are subjected to, not that of the US gov.
It does not indicate that the USA is less free, it might indicate that the people running the school believe in limiting the freedom of their students.
Originally posted by jprophet420
It does not indicate that the USA is less free, it might indicate that the people running the school believe in limiting the freedom of their students.
Please explain to me how the first amendment was clearly circumvented yet freedom was not comprimised.
I now fully understand how Hitler came to power, and that it is happening again today.
Originally posted by NIcon
reply to post by Xtrozero
Xtrozero, as to the students intent, nothing on this site is definitive. It could be argued that his only intent was to get the Senator's reaction to questions which he usually does not have to answer. I'm sure he probably had some some sarcastic replies prepared for any of Kerry's responses but that's besides the point. Also the tasering of this student was something I didn't take up in my post. My concern is with the initial interaction between the student and the officers in this video. All of your response concerned actions that occurred after the initial contact. You assume the officers were only trying to escort him out, but that's only an assumption as they did not state this. If they originally had verbally commanded him to leave, maybe none of this would have happened. But they didn't, they grabbed him, which caused this to happen. In my opinion, physical force should only be the primary means of control when there is a threat of harm to people or property. In a case like this the student was neither a threat to people or property. He was only trying to "cause a scene" which should be handled by verbal commands first. They should have allowed the student to turn it into a physical confrontation if he chose. But they did not, the officers chose to make it physical from the start.
Originally posted by N.B.A.Y.S.O.H
this video just proves how conditioned we all are or maybe thats just human nature not to get involved w/e it is its sad tht no one stood up for him or helped him