It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NuclearPaul
My understanding of it is that it's pretty undisputable. NASA admitted they discovered it (or at least something that fits it's description) in the 80's, and apparently mathematics proves it exists (due to the gravitational influence on other planet(s) orbits). It seems if you were in the scientific community and denied it's existance altogether, you would only damage your own credability, and a lot of people (including NASA themselves) are just keeping quiet about it now. It's also known as "Nibiru", and you should find many good threads about it here on ATS.
Do I believe in it personally? For sure!
It was believed that such a planet was required to explain the orbital characteristics of the outer planets Uranus and Neptune. Many searches have been performed and, to date, no evidence of such a planet has emerged. In addition, better information about the masses of outer planets has also now shown that no other planets are necessary to explain the planetary orbits.
Originally posted by d60944
Cripes, how much misinformation would you like to compres into one post?? For goodness sake, just goto NASA's own webpage and look for yourself:
Originally posted by NuclearPaul
Originally posted by d60944
Cripes, how much misinformation would you like to compres into one post?? For goodness sake, just goto NASA's own webpage and look for yourself:
Sorry, my mistake. I was unaware that they are denying it now.
It mustn't be true then.
[edit on 17/9/07 by NuclearPaul]