just a comment

i didn't mean that because it was discovered a long time after it is supposed to have been made that it is false. it just seems that if it describes why they fled, it may have been made quickly and maybe the settlers would not have had time to hide it or hide it well enough to take that long to discover it. it could be real. i don't know, i'm not a historical-rockologist. just from the information i've heard, which is not too much, it seems to me that the most likely conclusion is that the stone is false. but if you can prove it to be true, i have no way to disprove you.

test

[edit on 21-10-2009 by Skyfloating]