It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Thank you, I love your avatar. Im from Texas... I dig Tornado's.
Originally posted by Cowgirlstraitup7
Excellent find and an interesting theory. I don't know how people actually have the time and energy to find the most minute detail such as those in the video, but I am glad they do it. Just one more thing to show the world that 9/11 is not what we were told. Thanks for posting
Originally posted by DodgeG1
Very well put together video
But unfortuantly when they are displaying the letters on the boxes, they aren't exactly clear and the H could easily have been a A.
But the best bit of the video was the pictures of the boxes with wood and wires scattered (or placed) around them, How can wood and wire survive the "inferno" that bit got me.
Thanks for the link
Actually if you look at the allied signal case you can see the "A" is written in a manner that it couldnt be mistaken for a "H". I thought the same thing as you and looked at it numerous times.
Originally posted by DodgeG1
Very well put together video
But unfortuantly when they are displaying the letters on the boxes, they aren't exactly clear and the H could easily have been a A.
But the best bit of the video was the pictures of the boxes with wood and wires scattered (or placed) around them, How can wood and wire survive the "inferno" that bit got me.
Thanks for the link
The plane was manufactured in 95, put into service in 96. Honeywell wasnt acquired until 99. I dont even know if Honeywell was constructing cvr in 95 but I do know it would be odd to use a fdr and cvr from two different manufacturers. What would be the point? They are essential mounted right next to each other and are a part of the same package. Its possible, what I would guess, not probable.
Originally posted by jprophet420
i have to disagree about the honeywell and allied anomaly. it would be perfectly normal to interchange the same part with a different manufacturer.
i used to work in the semiconductor industry and companies buy each other out all the time. as a matter of fact, honeywell is in the semiconductor industry also. lets say i was working on a tool (thats what they call the machines that make microchips) and i needed to bring it up to production. I call stores (the storage facility at a factory) and they have a part that was manufactured before a buyout. it says its a brand x part and i need brand y. however the brand x part has the same specs. i use the brand x part of course. this is commonplace. they even have huge matrix's with interchangeable parts.
I wouldnt say "you would think they would evacuate them" considering they knew another flight was hijacked and flying towards the WTC... after the first plane hit. I would say its gross negligence at the LEAST to not call and evacuate those towers, or tell the firefighters to get out... or something.
Originally posted by Leyla
Originally posted by DodgeG1
Very well put together video
But unfortuantly when they are displaying the letters on the boxes, they aren't exactly clear and the H could easily have been a A.
But the best bit of the video was the pictures of the boxes with wood and wires scattered (or placed) around them, How can wood and wire survive the "inferno" that bit got me.
Thanks for the link
People were told to go back to their offices after the first WTC was hit. You would think they would evacuate them.
I can go on and on.
The plane was manufactured in 95, put into service in 96. Honeywell wasnt acquired until 99. I dont even know if Honeywell was constructing cvr in 95 but I do know it would be odd to use a fdr and cvr from two different manufacturers. What would be the point? They are essential mounted right next to each other and are a part of the same package. Its possible, what I would guess, not probable.