It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Beachcoma
I spoke to several Iranian acquaintances few months back about what would happen if the US attacked Iran. What would they do, what would they think? Now these people are living abroad and not in Iran because they really don't think much of the Iranian government. But they all seem to be very patriotic about their motherland nonetheless and told me that the response from Iranians overseas would be... simply put, bad.
[edit on 4-9-2007 by Beachcoma]
Originally posted by xstealth
That is what worries me, America is my mother land; and I don't want a lot of immigrants who hate us living among us and causing trouble when its out of the citizens hands.
Alexis Debat, director of terrorism and national security at the Nixon Center, said last week that US military planners were not preparing for “pinprick strikes” against Iran’s nuclear facilities. “They’re about taking out the entire Iranian military,” he said.
Debat was speaking at a meeting organised by The National Interest, a conservative foreign policy journal. He told The Sunday Times that the US military had concluded: “Whether you go for pinprick strikes or all-out military action, the reaction from the Iranians will be the same.” It was, he added, a “very legitimate strategic calculus”.
Originally posted by Conundrum04
Alexis Debat, director of terrorism and national security at the Nixon Center, said last week that US military planners were not preparing for “pinprick strikes” against Iran’s nuclear facilities. “They’re about taking out the entire Iranian military,” he said.
Debat was speaking at a meeting organised by The National Interest, a conservative foreign policy journal. He told The Sunday Times that the US military had concluded: “Whether you go for pinprick strikes or all-out military action, the reaction from the Iranians will be the same.” It was, he added, a “very legitimate strategic calculus”.
www.prisonplanet.com...
Okay, nevermind my last post. THESE PEOPLE ARE COMPLETELY INSANE!
So the logic goes like this:
Since they're probably going to react the same way if we bomb their nuke facilities, we might as well just take out their whole military too.
Wow! Just wow!
Originally posted by future flow
makes me think maybe they have some backup.....maybe in the form of china and russia?
Originally posted by Jaruseleh
Iran is going to have a hard time retaliating on Israel and our locations in Iraq when they have no military left. if we hit iran, we will hit them extremely hard. I don't think most people comprehend how much we threw at Iraq the first night of Desert Storm and Shock and Awe. If you don't know, imagine a bunch of planes flying in and bombing...now multiply that by about 1000. Iran won't have much left to hit us with....
Most of the people that are posting here are completely delusional beyond comprehension. When we invaded Iraq, all Iraq could do was just sit there and take the "shock and awe" bombings. Iraq's military was so depleted due to sanctions that all they could do was wait until US ground troops invaded to defend their country.
Iran, on the other hand has a real army and is not going to just cover their eyes while the we come in and do another "shock and awe"campaign(which no way in hell we will do).
Originally posted by BlackWidow23
3. I love how people seem to think that Israel is just some poor little kid quivering in the corner unable to defend itself against its big-bad-scary Arab neighbors. You people are wrong. Israel could take on Syria quite easily, it has the same advantages that the US has over Iran.