UFO Recorded from Airplane over the Hurricane Dean

Unless I'm mistaken and it's actually a different video, can I for once - the first time - categorically and undeniableyshout....
HOAX HOAX HOAX -

yay -

fair play to the OP who got it off of youtube (who no doubt posted it in good faith), but it's gotta be a hoax now.

Anyone wanna argue?

not that I'll be awake necessarily....

:0

[edit on 21-8-2007 by more_serotonin_pls]

Originally posted by ArMaP
If you still have it on your computer can you please tell if this is the same video?
Thanks.

Thats not the same one, theres not even a "UFO" that I could find in this one.
It is however a really cool video of a plane flying over a hurricane, also a very nice shot of the eye below him.
Whether this is Dean or not, IDK but its definitely a hurricane and probably is Dean

It's the same video - just without the light thingy - i'm convinced of it - come on people - support me here....

Aint it a good job I saved it as an .flv. file


It is the same footage, just this one has a silly little reflective light.

I am no debunker - I believe John Lear for God's sake - but this is fake....


Anyone wants me to email them the .flv of the footage that is no longer youtube, U2Ul me...

It';s all yours..

[edit on 21-8-2007 by more_serotonin_pls]

reply to post by more_serotonin_pls

Anyone wants me to email them the .flv of the footage that is no longer youtube, U2Ul me...
It';s all yours..

Cool, I downloaded it to, using the download helper addon for firefox.
I havent re-viewed it yet to compare the footage but to me it seemed different.
I dont remember the cameraman panning down to the eye in the "ufo" one
I'll look again soon but seeing the eye from just above the storm seems like to it would be pretty memorable for me.

I did not got a chance of watching the first video when it was posted, I did watch the second one and I must be blind because I did not see anything, not even the light thing some people are referring too. Cool view though.

Originally posted by Lexion
First :
Posted on You-Lose. Oh-so reliable. Yeah...

Second:
It's a reflection either off the window, or as
mentioned, off a TV screen.

Not amused,
Lex

Another worthless post from this guy. You may be right that it is a reflection, it is very hard to tell and that explanation actually makes more sense to me than anything else. But because the video is posted on Youtube (aka "You-lose" to degenerates) makes it un-reliable? You need to wake up and step down from your high horse Bro because your condecending comments are getting real stale. Youtube is a way to share videos and many people know no other way. Also, it will get the video out to a large number of people. Yeah, there is tons of trash there, but there is trash everywhere. The challenge is to "Deny Ignorance" and look at the content, not where the content was posted. Do you have a more "reliable" video site sir? I have seen so many posts of yours and they all go the same way. You talk down to people constantly, your style is elementary and your ignorance is unmatched. I know many others who feel the same way. Lex get a clue your thoughts are nothing more than a joke Bro. WAKE UP!!!!!!!!

Ok on the first post the UTube video is no longer available.... On the second one posted it was just a beautiful view of the clouds nothing more that I could see.
Now I posted the other day that I saw (and have on my recorded stuff) 4 minutes of NASA footage of UFOs spiraling and dancing among the tops of the clouds above Dean.
I couldn't believe the footage and then POP! They changed the picture to a still of the arms of the rover or something,
When they came back on it was from the space station and they were making sure that the live feed was cancelled and to allow for a delay. Now, what to do? How to show you my evidence? If you know me, I never hoax or play games when it comes to providing proof of Et/UFO interaction with earth.
How can I get it to the site? Are you willing to talk me through it? U2U me tomorrow. It is late night Tuesday 8-21

OK what they came on and said after the accidental view of more than hurricane Dean was this.
" Huston we finally broke the code on how to display GMT on the recorder. So this became an order of magnitude easier."
"Copy that we were just discussing that on the ground."
"For future reference it's display data code presented to the mission management team on Monday afternoon."
"Playback of camera views from International Space Station as they flew across the West side of the Yucatan headed across the gulf of Mexico just about 20 minutes ago the view looking toward the east to capture..." And my recording stops there.

Any ideas what they are talking about?

Saw this first on the news and tracked down Nasa pictures Moving targets, are they an experiment or extraterrestrial?









Look these up at Nasa to get full res... Happy hunting

OK now you know how I said there was about 4 minutes of footage? Here's a bit more of what they said.

"Go."
"Endurance Huston for playback."
"Go."
"OK starting 20/12 which is in about 2 1/2 minutes we have 30 minutes of solid K.U. so we'll take the playbacks if you have them by that time."
"OK and what MET did you want?"
"IM message 133 there all in the GMT times if that helps. If we need to convert them let us know."
"Nope I'll get it no problem."
"Hey Scott the first one I can give you is, so you don't have to go look at it is 1436-1432 GMT."
"Copy."

And that is when they switch to the rover arm. Now am I just excited? Or are they possibly discussing changing the recorded play back so that the possible craft is not detected?

reply to post by antar


GMT Ground Moving Targets

YES! Geniecommand! UH HUh -UH HUH Now that's what Im talking about, I still would like to recored it and let people see it in action. They look like little black stationary blips on the stills. At first I honestly thought that they were our military planes and then realized that no plane could fly that close to the hurricane and that our jets don't move that fast and smoothly. I LOVE this, and I can't wait for the ones that speak the lingo to come on and do some splainning...

reply to post by Kr0n0s


Not sure if you got my request but U2U says I cannot message you without having 50 posts. Are you on YouTube?

HUH??? What do you mean Ground Moving Targets? That's hardly the ground and those are most certainly not ground based vehicles!
Thanks Geniecommand. Are you sure that it does not mean General Mnt Time? Maybe not all of it though humm?

Here is the final message I have, one question , what is message 133?

"Hey Scott we'll give you a call to stop it.'
"OK thanks."
"Endeavor Huston for Scott."
"Go ahead."
Hey Scott on the playbacks just want to make sure were clear um at times listed and message 133. What we want and once you get to the end of one you can fast forward to the next and continue to play, if were coming up on a com gap or handover or something then well call and tell you to pause but other than that well just abide by message 133 if that's alright with you."
"Yeah, that's no problem."

Well that's all I saved. And it could all be totally irrelevant to UFO footage and time gap-ping the videos, but hey, I am not a NASA tech. I am hoping someone here on the forum can tell me if this could have to do with the few minutes of what I saw as UFOs over Hurricane Dean. If they were, there were a truck load of them. Like a virtual vacation spot for the galactic elite. Imagine skiing on hurricane clouds...

reply to post by antar


Sorry was pulling your leg about the meaning of GMT....lol

Have a look at the pictures in the top right hand corner there are several running in a row. Reminds me of the Jody Foster movie about Hurricane chases. The reason I think that these Orbs are not man made (they could be secret military Orbs) is that some are opaque and are not using conventional methods to fly. Top left hand corner is an orb moving faster than the film speed.

I say to the US public stop Nasa's funding till they come out publicly and explain that this is a common phenomena because that is their job.

Possible scenarios for Orbs in hurricane:

Sensible
Unknown Experiment
Sensor and monitoring equipment
Slowing down hurricane

Ridiculous
Speeding up hurricane
Sucking static to store for later power use
Joyriding
God lost his marbles
Shuttle flushed toilet (this has been used before and would make the astronauts looks stupid because thier poos would be too big)

[edit on 22-8-2007 by geniecommands]

[edit on 22-8-2007 by geniecommands]

[edit on 22-8-2007 by geniecommands]

GMT = Greenwich Mean Time

And the 'com gap' is communication gaps, when there is a 'hand off' of communications,
between ground or satellite relay stations, or a short lapse in coverage.

howstuffworks
NASA's Mission Control in Houston will send signals to a 60 ft radio antenna at White Sands Test Facility in New Mexico. White Sands will relay the signals to a pair of Tracking and Data Relay satellites in orbit 22,300 miles above the Earth. The satellites will relay the signals to the space shuttle. The system works in reverse as well.

Hope that helps.

Here is one of those pictures, I can only make it one click bigger, can anyone else make it alot bigger please so I can take a look? Thanks.

spaceflight.nasa.gov...

There is already a thread about those pictures.

It's called Hurricane Dean and objects?

Even if the video that was the reason for this thread was deleted from YouTube, I suppose we should not shift the discussion to a different subject that has its own thread.

The consensus on the other thread is that the black objects are dirt or photographic artifacts. If you grab all 3 images, drop them into photoshop, use the magic wand tool to grab the objects, and drop them in layers in a new image file, you'll see that the objects are in the same place in each image.

I do believe NASA photography has captured anomalies that could be extraterrestrial craft... Just not in those particular images. Thanks for sharing them, though!

(edited to add)
I grabbed the first image and dropped it into PS in order to isolate the dark spots. The magic wand tool won't let me grab all the spots at once, meaning they're different colors. A little less than half of them are blue black, the other half or so are purple black. Honestly, I don't do much with photoshop other than crop my digital camera pictures and make the file size smaller for uploading. I don't know squat about photographic artifacts or whether they're normally different shades

[edit on 22-8-2007 by Busymind]