posted on Aug, 7 2007 @ 03:06 PM
I've been lurking these boards for awhile now and I thought I had somewhat of a decent idea that I could add to what seems like the same argument
fought over and over again. Oh well if I get chewed out for it.
So there are a lot of simulations about what happened to the buildings, but what if someone made a simulation that was completely the other way... I
suggest instead of all these people making the same 9/11 documentary over and over again, or making the same 9/11 website over and over again, why
doesn't someone make a real simulation of what would of occurred if it was controlled demolition. Computer or real life models. Create one of the
towers and place where people think explosives could have been placed (i.e. in the basement or where those plumes jet out of the sides of the
buildings) and see what happens when they go off. If the building collapses in the same way it did on 9/11 then we would be a lot closer to knowing if
it was an inside job or not. And if the collapse is completely different then we'll know it was obviously not a controlled demolition.
It would be a lot of work, but why not? If people are willing to put that much time in making a website or documentary, why not just put that time and
work into something that could really prove if it was an inside job?
If this is way off base let me know. Thanks for reading.