It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by D.E.M.
All i can say is that is very, very strange. I like the detail and the fact that it does not appear, at first glance, to be 'shopped.
The row of ball-like lights. My first thought was that it reminded me of the banners sometimes towed behind planes, but obviously that would be rediculous, Since there is no plane. Seems like this summer is shaping up to be full of interesing things!
Just my 2 cents.
Originally posted by themaster1
That's interesting the pictures looks good
Can you describe what you saw in details like: the shape,speed of the object(s) the colors etc..
Originally posted by D.E.M.
Hmm, well then. Looking at the furthest left in the expanded view, it appears to be a silver sphere with slight ledge running near the centre and two dark dots on the top.
The object to the left in the first picture, the straight line one, did it follow the one to the right? I mean, did it assume an acension/descension like the object to the right?
[edit on 4-8-2007 by D.E.M.]
Originally posted by MajesticTwelve
the row is caused by the 4 seconds exposure so it really is 1 item
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Next time if you see these boost your iso to 800 so you can use lower shutter speeds. And use your self-timer to avoid the shake that happens when you press the shutter realease.
Originally posted by Palasheea
Oh.... I'm jealous! Last summer there seemed to be quite a bit of activity over Lake Erie which my balcony overlooks -- but so far this year I've not seen anything at all!
Your photo's are impressive and can't wait to see more!
Originally posted by AGENT_T
Originally posted by MajesticTwelve
the row is caused by the 4 seconds exposure so it really is 1 item
Nope. You would get a solid line.. not individual circular lights.
Interesting pics. Will take a better look in the morning
Originally posted by cjb Actually MajesticTwelve is correct. If I were to take a comparable say, one second shutter image of the object, only one would appear in the frame. You have not allowed for the light to be blinking, at roughly one second intervals in this case, leaving the 'space' between the same object over a four second exposure.
Originally posted by elevatedone
wow nice pics.
These look really cool.
You stated that you'll share others later, do mean other pics from this same sighting / event or have you seen others?