posted on Jul, 24 2007 @ 07:11 PM
Given the recent advances in digital software technology it is quite easy to put a photo that is literally unchallengeable.(almost) 2 great links
below . If a hoaxer then presents this as truth, and bolsters his or her claim with documents purporting that have been stolen from a government
agency, almost like the nigerian scammers, where he purports to be a bank official..but trust him.he has something too good to be true... do we have a
duty to report that? Should we?If the hoaxer then proceeds to a second party set up a store front, and derive pecuniary benefit, do we have collusion
or conspiracy to committ fraud?
digital forensics
digital forensic article
Mind you I am not speaking of a viral campaign, which does not present itself as truth to begin with. Are the parties that help propagate the hoax co
conspirators, and are sites , as example only..LMH.. that fail to put waivers or notice (like the psychic mediums on tv do "for entertainment
purposes only") liable for aiding and abetting after the fact?
What do you think..if someone posted a digital picture of you in a compromising position, and presented it as the truth. These are problems facing
courtrooms confronted with digital imagery, but I can assure you they would not hesitate to bring down the hammer on a hoax
Are there internet laws now..or is this still the wild wild west ..Shouldnt we set the guidelines before someone else does.?
Thank you for your input and hope we can make it safe here and a model for other forums.
SyS
some helpful resources
cyber legal database
crimereporting
"There are sheep...and sheep herders...then there are the wolves" Unknown
[edit on 24-7-2007 by Sys_Config]
[edit on 24-7-2007 by Sys_Config]