If a 757 REALLY hit the Pentagon then when not show us the footage ?

We can sit here and debate the finer points of why 9/11 was a inside job to the cows come home, but the bottom line is if a 757 REALLY hit the Pentagon then simply why not just show us the footage taken from the countless security cameras proving the official story ?.

what possible reasons could the US government have for withholding the countless pieces of footage showing what REALLY happened on that faithfull day ?. But hey if you still believe a 757 hit the Pentagon im selling the Statue of Liberty for $2500, payments can be made to my Paypal account.


[edit on 17-7-2007 by helium3]

what possible reasons could the US government have for withholding the countless pieces of footage showing what REALLY happened on that faithfull day ?. But hey if you still believe a 727 hit the Pentagon im selling the Statue of Liberty for $2500, payments can be made to my Paypal account.

Kind of a pointless post isnt it? Since it wasnt a 727 that hit the Pentagon, but a 757. By the way, just how many pieces of footage do you think exist that show the jet? (without counting all the parking lot security cameras that the CT's seem to be in love with)

Heaps, we all know they confiscated the petrol stations footage. Not knowing an exact number of cameras the Pentagon uses for security purposes, its not like the US government is just going to have one grainy low-res camera in the parking lot.

My office has over 50 cameras so its safe to say the Pentagon has 100's.


FBI Withholding 84 More Tapes of Pentagon on 9/11

The FBI is withholding at least another 84 surveillance tapes that were seized in the immediate aftermath of the attack on the Pentagon.

Will theres a start, how about the government releases those tapes ?.

[edit on 17-7-2007 by helium3]

Just because a business has a camera doesn't mean its pointed in the
correct direction! Many cameras are directed to watch a specific area
and only that area. Seizing the all the camera footage in the immediate
vicinity in hope you see something is a standard invesigative tactic.
Problem is the the Pentagon is in low spot near the Potomac River -
Highway 395, an elevated roadway which runs past the Pentagon blocked
most of the views from surrounding buildings. The Citgo gas station
camera was designed to watch the store to prevent shoplifters not to
scan for terrorists!

the real question is to me how long did it take them to destroy all the footage? because i doubt, if what is suspected to have happened is on video was recorded that they would archive such a smoking gun for future civilians to discover. if anyone involved with the video recovery was brave enough to save a tape what would it take for that individual to post it. it must way heavy on the minds of some body involved. if "hypothetically" it was a missile and a cover up it would take a large group i'd think and quick placement of all plane parts but most uncontrollably it would take all involved to not have a conscience and stay silent. who knows why they aren't showing the videos. perhaps its done to not only generate fear in the "war on terror" but also of the "new world order." this would make a great con traversal sequel to the x-files and throw in some alien cover up. i personally don't know what to think of this one because there
'appears" to be good evidence on both sides of the coin and it all comes out smellin real bad.

So let me get this straight, there is only one camera focused the side of the Pentagon where the imapct was ?.

Thats ludicrous.
Seriously? There's got to be DOZENS of camera's in my mind, that would of caught the plane entering pentagon airspace, and slamming into the side.

1 grainy camera? heh.....
Jacktripper did some excellent research on camera's from the hilton that were positioned directly at the pentagon...

If that was the only camera the pentagon had training on that side, id be SERIOUSLY concerned at the level of security the US puts on its strategic command centres.

What ever hit the Pentagon, your never meant to know. Its that simple.
They dont release 'frames' of low quality blur if they have good quality cctv footage...
likewise, they dont leave all the camera's in the public sector if its holds the core of the conspiracy..

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Thats ludicrous.
Seriously? There's got to be DOZENS of camera's

Well some people think thats not true....yet we are the conspiracy theorists.

Well, according to the no plane theory, the US gov is capable of faking planes hitting the WTC on live footage, so I really can't understand why they haven't managed to fake the footage to show a 757 hitting the pentagon yet, 6 years after the event.

This has nothing to do with the WTC attack how in the world can you fake the wings folding and going inside the hole? That would make Starwars look like a work of reality. It simply not possible people would laugh at a video like that. If anyone believes that there were only 2 grainy cameras around the pentagon recording the impact has obviously some kind of problem.

I still can't believe some people defend the nonrelease of the many confiscated videos in the Pentagon strike using all sorts of reasoning. It bugs me to no end. Are you employed by someone to come and do this or do you really believe it's about some kind of "National Security" thing?