It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
Are you serious? This is probably one of the worst documentaries on 9/11 i've ever seen!
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
The POD theory and the "flash" is misinformation..
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
Thermite being offered as the only explanation for collapse.. is misinformation.
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
A globalhawk/skywarrior crashing into the pentagon.. is misinformation.
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
This entire documentary is just a joke, and really does not deserve any truth seekers time. Infact, it really is on par with "Loose Change".. infact, the similarities between them is quite striking... is that coincidence?
No. This documentary is damage control, based upon bs research and analysis, and really provides nothing new, let alone any conclusions that people can take away and hold up against the official story.
Poor show.
Originally posted by Implosion
Also, IMO, the "no plane" theories are complete BS.
Originally posted by Implosion
It is my understanding that many of these people have testified to the fact that they saw two planes hit skyscrapers on the morning of September 11, 2001. Am I to understand that these people didn't know what they saw until they went home and asked their television?
Originally posted by LurkerBeast
eyewitness86, is it not more likely that explosives where built into the building, which is why it pretty much pulverized like it did? Why jump to conclusions and start to speculate about “exotic weapons” (whatever that is)?
Originally posted by LurkerBeast
And the NO PLANE theory seems like an effort to discredit and derail the truth movement. Really, every single media corporation involved in filming on 9/11 would have to be “in on it”. There would be dozens of individuals within the media companies that would know of this fraud. Not one single media individual have come forward. This is a much more complicated explanation than to say that 2 airplanes where RC’ed into the buildings. What about amateur video? I’ve seen a few of those as well (capturing the second plane), have they been ‘faked’ as well?
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
So your settling for the theory which "seems" to be more convienient for your own conspiracy theory viewpoint.. you've just admitted your own error. You've just written down evidence that your not being honest to yourself, least not that you know of yet. Please take the time to reconsider the no-plane idea. You will know the truth in the end, and i offer this to you to save you time.
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
The no-plane theory has been slandered from the start because it is the truth.
You think no-planes is more complicated than setting up two remote controlled planes, having them take off, not involving people at an airstrip, or many others involved in getting the planes airbourne, monitoring them (FAA, NORAD) etc..
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
No-planes is by far the most simple explanation, and the only one which fits all the evidence.
Few people would be in the know.. only those who are creating the animation, and helping insert it into the live feeds for the media channels, rather than dozens if the planes were actually real and piloted.
Originally posted by LurkerBeast
I’m not settling for any theory, I’m just using common sense and evaluating what is more likely. I don’t claim to know for sure that the TV imagery has not been faked. I’ve checked out the no-plane theory, however, and I’ve not found anything conclusive that would lead me to believe no planes hit the WTC towers.
Originally posted by LurkerBeast
Yes, I do think this is a far more believable scenario. Theoretically you’d only need a small covert-op group to ensure the remote controlled airplanes took off and then continue to fly them by remote control. There’s no need to involve external parties.
This fits together with the fact that the military was running exercises that involved the exact same scenario, thus causing confusion for FFA /NORAD.
Originally posted by LurkerBeast
What about the amateur video? What about other eye-witness accounts? There were plenty of people with their cameras locked on the WTC towers after the first plane hit. Do you really think NOBODY would have noticed if it just exploded without an airplane actually hitting?
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
but i wholeheartedly feel that the no-plane theory is the truth.. i know it seems the most "out there" and most "unlikely", but when you've eliminated all other possibilties, the truth is what remains, no matter how improbable.