It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
maybe it really is a big ball of cheese!
\
Originally posted by ChocoTaco369
I base this speculation on a few things. In order to speculate, we need to recall some of John Lear's past statements:
Originally posted by weedwhacker
.it is NOT a solid iron ball any more than the false-color images in '2001: A Space Odyssey' are showing 'solid' oceans on Earth undulating wierdly...
This visible neon plasma layer, as well as a thicker, deeper plasma layer of silicon, entirely covers the actual rocky, calcium ferrite surface layer of the sun. The visible photosphere covers the transitional region that is the actual surface of the sun, much as the earth's oceans cover most of the surface of the earth.
Originally posted by ChocoTaco369
I had an interesting thought lately. We all know Earth is known as "the blue planet." Reason being is that nearly three quarters of our surface is covered in water. Well, we all also know that planet Earth isn't the only blue planet in our solar system - Neptune is even bluer. So I had the thought: what if planet Neptune is a waterworld?
I base this speculation on a few things. In order to speculate, we need to recall some of John Lear's past statements:
1.) John Lear has stated that he believes there are no such things as "gas giants," or more formally, "the only gas giant in our solar system is NASA." This would mean that all planets have some type of solid surface.
2.) John Lear has stated that the sun is not a giant thermonuclear ball of fire, and that is actually an electromagnetic sphere. The sun's electromagnetism interacts with the atmospheres/electromagnetic properties of planets. This interaction then generates the planet's temperature. This would imply that a planet's distance from the sun does not dictate its temperature, and as long as the planet is within reach of the sun's energy (within the heliopause), the planet could be sufficiently warmed.
If these two things are in fact true, that would mean that Neptune could have a temperature similar to Earth's, along with a solid surface to walk on.
Here is the assumed "accepted" composition of Neptune:
To John Lear, Sleeper or anyone else that knows more than the average Joe: do you believe the above diagram is accurate? Basically, what are your views on Neptune? Do you believe that it possesses a solid surface and a surface composed nearly entirely of water?
Bright blue, white wispy clouds...it sure looks beautiful. Does anyone possess the belief that Neptune is not a gas giant/ice giant and is in fact a giant planet covered in a vast, blue ocean?
I just thought it was an interesting possibility...
Originally posted by Spawwwn
Uhh..i wouldn't base your findings around the "Scientific" works of john lear. Everything i've seen him state as "Fact" seems to be based more in science fiction than in science fact.
it's pretty simple conclusion..if you're using *real* science.
Liquid Water Oceans in Ice Giants
Starting from an assumed temperature at a given upper tropospheric pressure (the photosphere), we follow a moist adiabat downward. The mixing ratio of water to hydrogen in the gas phase is small in the photosphere and increases with depth. The mixing ratio in the condensed phase is near unity in the photosphere and decreases with depth; this gives two possible outcomes. If at some pressure level the mixing ratio of water in the gas phase is equal to that in the deep interior, then that level is the cloud base. Alternately, if the mixing ratio of water in the condensed phase reaches that in the deep interior, then the surface of a liquid ocean will occur.
Icy geysers may erupt on Pluto's largest moon
18:23 18 July 2007
NewScientist.com news service
Maggie McKee
Geysers of liquid water and ammonia are erupting on Pluto's large moon Charon, new observations suggest. The work bolsters the idea that Charon may harbour a liquid ocean beneath its surface – and just possibly, life.
It may sound like science fiction, but most of this fanciful description is true. NASA's Voyager and Galileo spacecraft have shown Europa to be a frigid world dotted with remnants of "cryo-volcanoes" and rafts of ice similar in appearance to those seen on Earth's polar seas during springtime thaws. As astonishing as the surface sounds, Europa may be even more interesting underground. Many scientists think that tidal friction from nearby Jupiter heats the interior of the moon to temperatures where liquid water is possible.
Beneath its icy crust, Europa could harbor the solar system's largest ocean!
Cook suspects the process is akin to one occurring on Saturn's moon Enceladus, where a vast plume of water vapor has been found spewing from long fissures in the ice – dubbed "tiger stripes" – on the moon's south pole (see Giant water plume spews from Saturn's moon).
Lake Vostok (Russian: восток, "east") is the largest of more than 140 subglacial lakes found under the surface of Earth's southern-most continent — Antarctica. It is located at [show location on an interactive map] 77° S 105° E, beneath Russia's Vostok Station, 4,000 meters (13,000 feet) under the surface of the central Antarctic ice sheet.....
Due to the lake's similarity to a moon of Jupiter, Europa, confirmation that life can survive in Lake Vostok might strengthen the argument for the presence of life on Europa......
To probe the waters of Lake Vostok for life without contamination, plans were initiated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory to start with a melter probe — the so-called "cryobot" — which melts down through the ice over Lake Vostok, unspooling a communications and power cable as it goes. The cryobot carries with it a small submersible, called a "hydrobot", which is deployed when the cryobot has melted to the ice-water interface. The hydrobot then swims off and "looks for life" with a camera and other instruments.
Originally posted by topsecretombomb
The great Nikolai Tesla also talked of the earth having its own Electromagnetic source that can be tapped into, thus creating free energy for all earths habitans. So yes, I generally do believe in that Sun Energy theory.
More than 99 percent of matter in the Universe exists in the plasma state though nature rarely produces plasma on Earth's surface. Earth's electrically neutral environment is a rare exception.
Plasma processes are important factors in the behavior of stars, interstellar clouds, comets, the aurora, and even in our upper atmosphere. If scientists are to fully understand astrophysical and geophysical phenomena, they first must have a clear understanding of how matter behaves in the plasma state.
Springtime is blooming on Neptune! This might sound like an oxymoron because Neptune is the farthest and coldest of the major planets. But observations by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope reveal an increase in Neptune's brightness in the southern hemisphere. Astronomers consider this increase a harbinger of seasonal change. The observations, made over six years, show a distinct increase in the amount and brightness of the clouds encircling the planet's southern hemisphere.
NASA Hubble Space Telescope observations in August 2002 show that Neptune's brightness has increased significantly since 1996. The rise is due to an increase in the amount of clouds observed in the planet's southern hemisphere. These increases may be due to seasonal changes caused by a variation in solar heating.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Zoron, regarding Europa... John Lear said a few times that the tidal lock theory is crap.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Zoron, regarding Europa... John Lear said a few times that the tidal lock theory is crap.
Ummm this has what to do with the existence of water?
Originally posted by Matyas
Did you know it rains diamonds on Neptune?
Originally posted by ChocoTaco369
Did you know it rains diamonds on Neptune?
The true skeptic is skeptical of all claims. That's what bugs me most about most skeptics. They'll trounce anything that isn't mainstream with the most twisted logic they can come up with, yet they'll believe anything NASA says with open arms. How is that being skeptical? It's just being a sucker for something else.