Cheney-Bush Planning For New 9/11

Cheney-Bush Planning For New 9/11

www.truthera.com

If there are any doubts about the truth and accuracy of the allegation that the Cheney-Bush regime did 9/11, Dr. David Ray Griffin dispels each and every one of them in his latest book on the subject, Debunking 9/11 Debunking. He again emphasizes the stand-down order angrily reiterated by Cheney as overheard and observed by Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta, and to which the latter offered testimony to that fact during the 9/11 Commission hearings.

(visit the link for the full news article)

The 9/11 Commission Report falsified the time of Cheney’s presence in the bunker-command center, changing the time as occurring after 10:00 a.m. when in fact Cheney was reported by several as being in the bunker earlier at 9:25 a.m.



www.truthera.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

What does that have to do with the title? o.O



Mod Note: You Have a U2U- Click Here.

[edit on 30-6-2007 by DontTreadOnMe]

I kind of doubt the source used here never heard of them.

They are however carrying another story that might be worth looking into

Area 51 Worker Attacked By Aliens

the Norman Mineta quote is very real though, it deserves more attention, imo

YouTube link

Originally posted by mister Jones
the Norman Mineta quote is very real though, it deserves more attention, imo

YouTube link

I watched this and I think it's clear that Cheney said the order to shoot them down still stands, the opposite of what is said here.

In any case, I don't think this belongs in the news forum.

Originally posted by Renshin
What does that have to do with the title? o.O
Mod Note: You Have a U2U- Click Here.

[edit on 30-6-2007 by DontTreadOnMe]

Right here, from the article:

"As Watson observes later on in his commentary, “Last month it was also reported that a high-level group of government and military officials has been quietly preparing an emergency survival program named ‘The Day After,’ which would effectively end civil liberties and implement a system of martial law in the event of a catastrophic attack on a U.S. city.” Considering the Cheney-Bush track record and the revelations concerning 9/11 documented by Dr. Griffin, is it really all that hard to imagine the limitless power these criminals can benefit from by initiating yet another 9/11?"

I think this part below (from the link) pretty well sums up the situation:

"Perhaps most important, these attorneys could have pointed out, Zbigniew Brzezinski had suggested in 1997 that the American public would support “imperial mobilization,” through which America could retain its primacy by taking control of the oil-rich region of Central Asia (which includes Afghanistan), only in the event of “a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat” ­ just as the American public had been willing to support “America’s engagement in World War II largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.” These defense attorneys could then have pointed out that “Rebuilding America’s Defenses,” perhaps inspired by Brzezinski’s argument, suggested that the process of transforming the USmilitary in the desired direction was “likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event ­ like a new Pearl Harbor.” They could have further pointed out that, besides the fact that 9/11 was widely compared to Pearl Harbor, it was also said to have presented “opportunities” by Bush, Rice, and Rumsfeld, with the latter saying that 9/11 created “the kind of opportunities that World War II offered, to refashion the world.” [The above excerpt is from Dr. David Ray Griffin’s latest book, Debunking 9/11 Debunking, pages 104 ­ 105.]"



[edit on 30/6/07 by forestlady]

Hey: If the order Cheney was so virulent about was to SHOOT THE INCOMING WHATEVER DOWN, it would have been shot down ! The young officer that questioned the VP at the last minute would not have asked if a ' shoot down order ' ' still stands ' because that would be a standard operation in case of an attack. Why would one want to call off a defense of an attacking whatever just before possible impact? Why would the young officer say " Do the orders still stand?, if the orders were protective in nature? Why in heavens name would there be an automatic expectation that protective measures would be called off at the last second absent idenitifcation, positive ID of the incoming as a non-threat; this did not occur.

That does not wash..the order was so unusual, so out of the ordinary, that an officer dared question the Growling Dick about it at the risk of angering him, which he did " The VP whipped his neck around and snapped " Have you heard anything to the contrary?" to the young man.
The young officer, and no doubt many others, were no doubt upset and concerned that there was a threat coming in and yet the VP had stopped all defensive protective measures. No wonder he asked what he did.

It would be ' contrary ' to normal operations to allow incoming threats to proceed past a certain point, hence the young officers concern. He was concerned because there was an obvious threat barreling down the airspace toward them and yet no one had reinitiated the defense system, stood down by Cheney's obvious order.

Nothing else makes any logical sense.