Breast Enhancement

Hello all,
This really isn't a mystery to the world but I have questions for, well, everyone. Does anyone here think that breast augmention is bad? I used to but lately I have been all for it. Should our society look down on women who want to change their appearance?

The way I look at it is that if you change your appearance to please one group of people, you may turn off people that liked you the way you were.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

[edit on 6/14/2007 by Spoodily]

But what if your appearance change is only to please you and nobody else?

It all comes down to what makes you happy. Nothing else matters because its a short life on this planet so be happy. peace.

Our nation is a nation of breast favoritism, I come from a culture that the butt is what favored.

We see the advertisement of breast all the time by models and stars on the TV, magazines and almost everywhere.

I consider breast enhancement a personal choice, is many instances that a woman may need to have their breast enhanced due to disfigurement, is actually women that never develop full breast.

Originally posted by freebrain
Hello all,
This really isn't a mystery to the world but I have questions for, well, everyone. Does anyone here think that breast augmention is bad? I used to but lately I have been all for it. Should our society look down on women who want to change their appearance?

Question: " Does anyone here think that breast augmention is bad?"

Answer: Imo, breast enhancement is ridiculous. Not 'bad'. Ridiculous.

Why? Well, explain why women would pay money and suffer pain and potential disfigurement, in order they might have a couple of bags of silicone shoved into their chest wall ?

What do breast do, precisely? For what purpose are they intended?

Do breasts mow the lawns, do the dishes, change babies diapers, drive cars, improve intelligence, feed the starving, improve conditions for the third world, change light bulbs, iron the curtains, etc ?

No?

Intended originally as Nature's way of feeding offspring, breasts have been transformed (the the usual-suspects, who are themselves breast-fixated as result of their neurotic feelings re: their own mothers) into 'objects of sexual desire' --- in the Western world. Not in indigenous societies, who're more emotionally and sexually mature.

Look at this situation clearly: we live in a society in which 'breast feeding' (a perfectly natural act) is deemed 'repulsive'. To the point where a woman in the process of breast-feeding her infant (covered by her large coat) was ousted from the Australian parliament. Women have similarly been asked to get off trains and buses and have been treated as criminals when breast-feeding their infants in public places such as airport lounges, etc.

Yet this same Western society pays millions of dollars to females who are famous for naught OTHER than their false-breasts: Anna Nicole Smith and Pamela Anderson Lee-plus, for example.

Early photos of Smith and Lee reveal them to have been noticeably lacking in breast-tissue: Smith for example, as a club-hostess, was flat as the proverbial pancake. A multi-billionaire paid for her breast-enlargement and the rest is history: this ordinary, thin, small-breasted female became internationally famous, as did Anderson-Lee --- for their 'large breasts'. In short, two bags of silicone reaped them untold wealth. Their 'acting ability' and 'talent' is/was negligent to non-existent. Their entire repertoire consisted merely of exposing the skin of their upper-body, streched tight over said bags of silicone (covered with stretch-marks and deformities also, which are shopped-out).

So -- a natural breast -- when being used for its natural purpose (feeding of infant) is considered 'obscene', 'repulsive', 'bad', 'wrong'.

Exposed false-breasts however are a money-earner: catapult skinny, no-talent nobodies into the multi-millionaire category.

For whose enjoyment are breasts artificially enlarged?

Clearly, this perverse situation has now enmeshed both male voyeurs and the females who have been entrained by society to believe that 'pleasing males' is a natural and yes, a necessary thing to do, from a 'survival' standpoint.

What do men like? Roared response: 'big tits'.

What do women like? Tentative response: ' to please men? '

Women now believe that in order to 'succeed', in order to match the 'competition', they require to have their breasts enlarged.

And males have been conditioned to believe that huge, gravity-defying breasts are the norm. They've been conditioned in this belief by invidious porn, movies, tv and 'mens' magazines'.

Worse -- men have been entrained to believe that if they are REAL men, then they MUST express a preference for 'big tits, big hooters, big jugs'.

Those males who're insecure about themselves and/or their sexuality, feel they must pretend to prefer large breasts --- or be judged 'nancy-boys, poofs, homos,' etc. by their peers.

Women have been conditioned to believe that 'real men' prefer 'big tits' and that if they have any hope of 'satisfying' a man or even getting one -- then they'd better go out and get some of that silicone stuffed in their chest wall. Once they have, so perverted have their natural desires, intelligence and beliefs become -- they convince themselves they feel 'More Sexy, More Womanly', courtesy of their false breasts.

Wow. What an industry. And aren't people stupid?

Did you know that the same neurotic 'momism' afflicted males were not satisfied with their 'false breast' industry?

Nope. Women were still 'too real, too natural, too animalistic' for their preferences. Still too assertive and naturally intelligent and normally sexual, too.

So these deviates pioneered a process via which they succeeded in eliminating the 'gag reflex'.

Now, the 'gag reflex' is what happens to you when your doctor or dentist examines your throat by pressing a spatula down on your tongue. Every now and then, they insert the spatula too far back, and you suffer an uncrontrollable urge to retch. That's the gag-reflex.

Women who're providing oral-sex often suffer from the gag-reflex, as the result of the penis thrusting itself down their throat.

So, there's the male, getting off by having his penis orally serviced by the subservient woman bent over his genitals --- and then suddenly, she 'spoils it', by jerking away and retching.

What a problem, eh?

How to solve it, so that males could enjoy provision of oral-sex without some fool of a female retching because of his sacred penis?

The same guys who invented 'breast enlargement' and sold it to the terminally stupid, ALSO invented a way of severing women's gag-reflexes !! Brilliant ! Now those females had no excuse for not 'pleasuring' males orally.

So picture it: the female. Do you remember what natural females actually look like? Yes, they have child-bearing hips and fleshy thighs. They have larger breasts than males as a rule, because it's the females who feed the young with their breasts.

Apart from that, there's not that much difference.

Females have hair all over their body, as do males. They sweat, like males. They defecate, like males. They fart, as do males. Their bodies are subject to the laws of gravity, as are those of males.

But men don't want 'natural' females. Why? Well, it's because there isn't that much setting the two sexes apart. And the more insecure about their sexuality males become ---- the more they NEED for artificial differences to be created between themselves and the opposite sex.

So females now shave or depilate the hair off their bodies. They use perfumes and deodorants to disguise their sweat. They liposuction the natural flesh off their bodies. They get as skinny and 'sexily female' as possible. Then they have false breasts inserted, to maximise the difference between themselves and men.

If the neurotic mother-worshippers of medical science had had their way, females' natural gag-reflexes would have been 'removed' also.

And what would the final result have been? What was the final result INTENDED to become?

You've got it ! Yes --- a barbie-doll creature. With the legs and hips of a 13 year old boy ---- and the breasts of a five ton wet-nurse ! Oh --- and with an ever available open throat (minus gag-reflex) to service all those men who had become sexually retarded and unable and unwilling to perform sexually in the normal way. Unable and unwilling to satisfy a woman. Unable and unwilling to even bother trying !

Sex, for them, with their plastic all-modified false-females, was to become a case of fondling and breast feeding from false silicone breasts, followed by orgasm provided from the barbie-doll's gag-free throat.

Ah, but you'll have to wait a few more years for that wet-dream to eventuate.

The medical ethics committees prohibited the mass severing of females' gag-reflexes.

Wake up girls

I get the feeling somebody has a complex with breast or something. Maybe not breast fed when a baby.

I have a question why do you really care what a person does to there personal body? Is it really that much of your business. Why not just say no I dont personaly like it and be done instead of a lecture from hell.

And dont call people stupid unless you are superior.

[edit on 14-6-2007 by earth2]

Dock6, that was a very thorough dissertation on the mammary gland's cultural and bodily function.

You have certainly risen this debate far above a tit for tat discussion.

[edit on 6/14/2007 by Spoodily]

Lol --- Thanks Spoodily.

Who could forget the unique grace and style of the inimitable Audrey Hepburn ? Tiny breasts. Her own woman. Idolised by millions. Always glorious to look at, to listen to and what a role model. She once said, with her brilliant smile and musical diction, that she'd never been tempted to enlarge her breasts, although movie producers often forced her to wear 'falsies'. " They (small breasts) never stopped men from finding me attractive." she said. And it was true. Some of the leading stars of her day adored and wooed her. She was a leader, not a follower and one of the most 'feminine' figures ever to grace the screen.

Similarly Katherine Hepburn, who was another leading star throughout decades and who continued to be much in demand well into her 70s.

" Not much meat on her, but what there is, is prime. " remarked leading star, Spencer Tracy, who was very much a 'man's man'.

Katherine and Audrey Hepburn were major stars all through the period when 'big busts' sought to eclipse the screen via such female actors as Jane Russell, Jayne Mansfield, Marilyn Monroe and Diana Dors, with their torpedo shaped breasts, arched backs, brash grins and 'seductively' half-closed eyelids.

Katherine and Audrey (and others of their ilk, Grace Kelly for example) were quality and substance. The large-breasted brigade, whilst admired and fun-looking women, were utilized to epitomise easily-won sex ... as opposed to women who were respected, admired and valued (and who refused to sell themselves out 'cheap').

In fact, when 'huge breasts much on display' became passe, Audrey and Katherine were still popular, even as middle-aged women, at which point, modestly sized breasts had returned to popularity in the form of models such as Twiggy, Jean Shrimpton and stars in the mould of Goldie Hawn (still going strong), Meg Ryan and Diane Keaton (gets better and better).

Strange, but women who made their mark based on talent, humour, naturalness (as opposed to surgical artifice), intelligence and unique style are the 'stayers' in fame-terms.

Sadly, those who are/were presented as primarily 'sexual objects' have never fared so well. Monroe, Mansfield, (both of whom died in disputed but equally horrible manner) Anna Nicole Smith (another case in question) Pamela Anderson Lee-plus, who at relatively early age is little more than a caricature of herself and the latest crop of ' breasts-on-display-that's-apparently-all-there-is-to-me' young women: Lindsay Lohan, Britney Spears, Jessica Whats-her-name, etc. will most likely not even climb the doubtful 'pinnacle' achieved by Anderson-Lee.

Maybe there's a clue there, somewhere?

Well said earth2, that is all that matters if it makes them happy then so be it. Life is way to short.

Its one thing if your breasts are disfigured from breat feeding 4 kids, or if one has grown significantly larger then the other one...

But if your breasts are au natural, why should you change them? There was a time in my life where I wished I had bigger boobs (i have a B cup, not ashamed to admit it!) because I thought mine were "too small", even for my petite 110lb frame. But Ive come to realize that the image we see on TV is never what it appears to be. Celebrities and models always have their photos retouched, giving them the perfect look. But in real life they are not like that at all! Everyone has flaws, and instead of dreading them, embrace them!

You should learn to love you just the way you are. Fixing something on the outside will not make you happier on the inside. you may think "once I have bigger breasts Ill feel so much better about myself, Ill like the way I look, Ill feel pretty," ect. But you will find flaws in your new breasts just like you nitpick about them now. (Ive had friends who have had breast implants. trust me. No one thinks they are perfect no matter how good they look!)

my breasts arent perfect. But I love them all the same. I always joke that I atleast have one good boob (one is very full, the other needs to catch up...if you know what I mean. LOL) But I think they look great.


beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and beauty comes in all shapes and sizes. Your beautiful just the way you are!