Roswell Hanger Footage Of Alien Body? (From movie)

Ok, anybody seen this? What is the story behind it? Authentic? Faked? Opinions?

www.disclose.tv...

Admin edit: This footage is part of the British comedy "Alien Autopsy" which is actually quite a good film. It was being shown here in the UK on Sky Movies only a couple weeks back.

[edit on 15-6-2007 by SimonGray]

Great video! Never seen it. Looks pretty authentic for 1947 video. I wonder if people can recognise somebody, i'm not familiar with old US military service men.

Yes, this is an interesting video, it has a good feel to it, in the sense that it feels like it could be a film from 1947 or so

The alien even looks like some of the pictures that have been leaked out into the Internet....

I don't know enough to even attempt to say this is real or a hoax, certainly raises my eyebrow.

Here it is on Youtube:



www.youtube.com...

Here are some pictures with faces, maybe somebody has a clue who they are.

Originally posted by Cygnific
Here are some pictures with faces, maybe somebody has a clue who they are.

Do they look alike to anyone else?

Isn't it amazing that the Military would pay to have pictures taken that badly.

The one thing that triggered something for me was a the 5 sec. mark where they are showing the feet. Look at the left foot.

I remember the experience when I was having the audio/visual implant put in through the right ear. Before anything started I was alone and there was this metal table next to the chair I was sitting in and on the bottom shelf of that metal table where feet, "lol" yup feet. I thought do they use rubber feet like men wear the rubber boots over there shoes when it rains. The feet were big I wonder if they came in different sizes

well the video was too old to tell if its real or fake but i think its fake if it was real i wouldnt be on the internet for evry one to see

Doesnt make sense why they would give the camera to someone who has no idea how to use it.
Thats usually a sign thats its fake right?
One other thing I noticed, doesnt it look like a female ET. 34 seconds in.

IMO it's as fake as all the other ET videos ive seen.

[edit on 14-6-2007 by earth2]

I just watched the video again, and someone in the video looks sort of like Marcel.

ok i have not seen this one, this is either real, or the other autopsy video floating around someone filmed that has been called a fake must have seen this and made an almost exact dummy or this is the same dummy it is eerily very much the same likeness in this video as the autopsy vid, looking around most of the uniforms seem to be very authentic from what i can tell but who knows, it just seems like the filmographer is either behind a lot of people and cant get close enuff or a detailed shot, or its been done to obscure the fake.

I just do not understand why someone would go to these lengths and involve so many to make a fake video.

My take? It appears to be doctored.

Take a close look at the style the cameraman is panning around the people. Is this how camera-men do it back in the 1940s? Most of the black and white documentaries in the 40s were shot stationary, never moving around. That was that the trademark style until...the steady cam decades later.

The way it's being shot is a bit too smooth..so one has to wonder...this either was shot by steady cam which is way too modern. Cameras were, at the time, huge and bulky and shot in 35mm film (if I'm not mistaken). The zooming and panning is all wrong.
Can someone confirm if 16mm portable cameras were in existence because this had to be shot on a smaller device? I have to say portable cameras did'nt come into the scene until after the 1950s, probably.

Second, the 'washed out' exposure contrast is too much. Reminds me greatly of the 'diffuse glow' effect on Photoshop. And the EBE seems too fake...it looks exactly like the one on the 'Alien Autopsy' hoax...and does not have the bloody/charred/damaged appearance.

If this is a government documentation, it would have to be shot in very clear light without anybody getting in the way. If scientists need to view the EBE on film, it has to be done stationary for steady viewing and in clear detail.

[edit on 14-6-2007 by Sanctum1972]

Maybe the cameraman was not a professional, maybe the film is 60 years old and get overexposure andother artifacts. Nobody knows with what camera this was filmed with, maybe it was a cheap camera that was at hand. This is not enough arguments to debunk it. Why not debunk it by naming WHO the people are there. This will proof allmost 100% real or fake.

Originally posted by Alien42

Originally posted by Cygnific
Here are some pictures with faces, maybe somebody has a clue who they are.

Do they look alike to anyone else?

He definitely reminds me of Thomas Dubose.

Another Image:

I watched this and immediately thought it was fake. Like previously said, the movement of the camera was a give away. To move a camera that size like they did would be difficult and not as smooth, plus the fact that it was not the style of the day.

The most telling for me is how the camera starts BEHIND the people, almost as if someone just happened to have a camera. Cameras were not as abundant as now, meaning the camera would have been set up stationary in the best position (without light effects) and then the people positioned around it.

However, who knows what handy cams the government had back then, plus if we can recognise the faces, just maybe this is a monumental break through video.

Interesting and frustrating video. As much as I believe that there is actual footage out there, this is just so poorly done that even if it was real it could never be used as evidence.

Hi there - "long time listener, first time caller"...

Actually, 16mm cameras were in existence at the time and even 35mm cameras can be utilized hand-held (done it in my film school).

It's their bulkiness which along with a wide focal lens that might actually serve to steady an image.

It's hard to say just how quickly, assuming this is authentic, the camera operator had to get filming done. With little preparation, he'd have to "eyeball" exposure and such and that might explain some of the less-than-stellar cinematography (helped by no small degree by the lo-res video compression).

As for "style", again, this is somewhat of a strange argument. Take a look at unedited combat footage and you'll see it's all over the place.

If this is a fake, it's even better than the Alien Autopsy footage. That we can see people's faces is a rather good sign. Even the way the one soldier is running at the beginning just seems "genuine".

Hopefully somebody can put some names to those faces!

Heres why I dont think its fake, becuz there is clearly evidence of the camrea being hidden, note the small view finders acutal footage, and off to each side there is lines like it was being concealed in a coat or box hell even a medical bag.

fake possibly real Im more leaning to real, and the footage is gonna be bad due to the chemicals decomposing that were used to capture the event on film.

And they would put this on the internet for Obvious reasons, to throw out more "proof" of ET exsistence and our gooberments ability to hide the fact they have had contact with em.

I sense a lot of anxiety in that film, some people rushing in for a look. Can you even begin to grasp how you would feel, react, even breath looking at something so incredible as a alien. Now put yourself in the cameramans shoes, the noise, smell of burnt alien and the hype let alone your own heartbeat.

I was asked to film a butchering of a moose my brother shot one year and I have to admit the quality of my filming skills while they cut up that magnificent animal was pretty horrid. I was in tears.

I am going to sit back and watch this films impact before I go shouting fake like most in ATS.

I remember seeing this video on ATS before. If I recall correctly, I think someone debunked it because of the military uniforms being incorrect somehow. I'll see if I can find anything with a search.