posted on Jul, 8 2007 @ 05:02 PM
Originally posted by Nemiro
Anything like this after the Second World War? I wonder.....
Absolutely. The romantic notion that the men who fought in the two world wars were any different is quite absurd. some of the differences between then
and now are
1. Moral values were in a state of flux at the time and many things that we consider to be morally spurious today were common practice and not subject
to ridicule then. In other words what we see as excessive violence in society by soldiers today was just the way of the world 60 odd years ago. Many
forms of violence were simply considered so normal that they didn't warrant report.
2. The vast majority of acts that were considered wrong by their standards were simply not reported, most notibly cases of violence against women.
Even if these acts were reported there were not the mediums of making these acts public that there are today. Basically the violence was not reported
or the public didn't hear about them.
3. An entire generation of men were subjected to extreme levels of violence during the war. Many of the violent acts were not regarded as being
violent due to the mental conditioning of the men during combat.
Like I said, the world has changed a lot, but the basic concept of war hasn't. As long as war forces men to fight men in war, there will be violence
in peace time.