Assuming all three were extremists, and all three were on a deserted island and there was only enough food for two of them. Which two of the three do
you think would side with each other? Who would be the lesser of the two evils for each person? And dont say one would kill both, as it defeats the
purpose of the argument. They have to team up with another person for survival.
I guess if one can get along with the other than all three could get along.
Kacen may be right also. If the Muslim is from the mid-east there is a good chance that they resent Israel and dislike the Jews. The KKK would likely
team up with the Muslim if it meant removing the Jew.
I would have said the KKK and the Muslim would get along more than the Jew before 9/11. But post 9/11 I cant see how the KKK member would side with
the muslim. I think the extremist KKK would have more hate towards muslims now, which would override their traditional hatred towards Jews. Its
interesting to note how the hardcore christians now are even more allied with the Jews in Israel after 9/11, and the KKK are also christians. Look at
the paradox there.