The Nature of the Construct - Insights in the Philosophy of the Illuminatus

Text

Everything really is stupidly simple
And yet all around is utter confusion
Fairy tales written may help you to see it
Do you understand about Lewis's Alice?
We fit all our lives into regular patterns
All that we really know is that we're really living

Lyrics by Traffic, Utterly Simple

Everything, really, is stupidly simple. Really. From the very earliest of our days, we learn to recite the Alphabet and count from 1 to 10, never knowing or realizing that The Construct is based upon this very foundation. Indeed, most will live and die without ever coming to understand that they were the product of and immersed into a Construct. Some may think of this Construct as “a Matrix”: The Letters and the Numbers and Sounds are the Construct, and collectively they tell a story and hide a truth, neigh, The Truth.

This Truth is known as “The Construct”.

The Construct is a philosophy, a philosophy that brings one “light” and “vision”. The Construct is the foundation for all the great Mystery Schools that have risen above the waves and sank back below the surface. The Construct provides the keys to inherent logic of the religious formulae that ensnare and emotionally tug at the collective soul of so much of humanity.

The Construct is a thing of beauty and awe, and it reveals through a rational philosophical science the very truth of the interconnectedness of all Things. Since every letter and every number and every sound are but building blocks of the construct, it stands to reason that all words are but reflections of the larger construct.

Everything is a tapestry, a web of life where if one strand breaks, the whole of the web becomes weakened. Once one comes to understand the Nature of the Construct, one comes to understand the nature of Things.

The Construct is the basic rational philosophical arbiter of Truth. It is simple, yet can be maddeningly confusing. This anonymous Hermetic writing from the 16th century hints at seeming confusion:

15. Let the studious Reader have a care of the manifold significations of words, for by deceitful windings, and doubtful, yea contrary speeches (as it should seem), Philosophers wrote their mysteries, with a desire of veiling and hiding, yet not of sophisticating or destroying the truth; and though their writings abound with ambiguous and equivocal words; yet about none do they more contend than in hiding their Golden Branch.

Let us explain first in words:

Take the Letter A. Is it not placed at position1? And take the Letter I, is it not shaped as if it were the Number 1? Can we then logically say that:

1 = A and
I = 1 ?
Therefore, it can be reasoned, that A = I, for if A = 1 and I = 1, then surely A = I. Yet, it is presumed, that A surely is not I. Or is it? Using simple reasoning derived from Geometry, we can reason that A = I for surely A = 1 and I = 1, so surely A must equal I. Yet I is 9 and A is 1, yet 1 is I and I is A.

How is this so? It is clear that A is not I, and I is not A, even as it can be shown that they are both “1” and hence “the same”.

As for the robes, those of Isis are variegated in their colors; for her power is concerned with matter which becomes everything and received everything, light and darkness, day and night, fire and water, life and death, beginning and end. But the robe of Osiris has no shading or variety in its color, but only one single color like to light. For the beginning is combined with nothing else, and that which is primary and conceptual is without admixture; wherefore, when they once taken off the robe of Osiris, they lay it away and guard it, unseen and untouched.



[edit on 27-5-2007 by TheFetch]

Originally posted by TheFetch
Text


Let us explain first in words:

Take the Letter A. Is it not placed at position1? And take the Letter I, is it not shaped as if it were the Number 1? Can we then logically say that:

1 = A and
I = 1 ?
Therefore, it can be reasoned, that A = I, for if A = 1 and I = 1, then surely A = I. Yet, it is presumed, that A surely is not I. Or is it? Using simple reasoning derived from Geometry, we can reason that A = I for surely A = 1 and I = 1, so surely A must equal I. Yet I is 9 and A is 1, yet 1 is I and I is A.

How is this so? It is clear that A is not I, and I is not A, even as it can be shown that they are both “1” and hence “the same”.



[edit on 27-5-2007 by TheFetch]

That would just be a crazy mans equation.

I'm not getting your point here?

i've never seen anyone use roman numerals as letters, then translate them back into numerology before.


Im not sure it works that way, although I'm completely ignorant to this particular theory. Something you've been working on, or just a late night?

i've never seen anyone use roman numerals as letters, then translate them back into numerology before.

Consider the MILE. There are 5280 feet.

M = 1000
I = 1
L = 50
E = 5

The total value is 1056.

Why is this important? Because the Number of Feet is a MILE is 5280.

5280/5 (1/5 of a Circle) = 1056 FEET, or the "word" MILE.

Take another.

ILLUMINATUS

A clever coded word, but easy once you see it.

I = 1
L = 50
L = 50
U = -
M = 1000
I = 1
N = -
A = -
T = -
U = -
S = -

The formula is as follows:

I(L+L)MI = 1(50+50)1001 = 11001001 = 11.001001 = Binary Pi, the "Omnific Word" of the Mystery Schools.

We then must resolve for U/NATUS. Now you can gain an appreciation for the "double headed eagle" which peers this way and that. For words are not seen in a "linear fashion" of "left to right" or "right to left", but rather, as "this way or that", and even "from the center out" or from the "edges in".



As the double headed eagle reveals, peer at words from right to left and left to right concurrent, and center out, in order to ascertain how it is crafted. This can further understood when you realise that "semitic languages as Arabic and Hebrew" are written from Right to Left and Western Systems are written from Left to Right.

This is the Double Headed Eagle. The "32" or "33" simply reveals the numbers of digits of Pi being used, 32 being the 32 decimal digits and 33 being the 32 decimal digits plus the 3 to the left of the decimal point.

But continueing.

U/NATUS is spun (for ease of Western "rational thinking" to reveal the following:

SUTAN/U

As Plutarch intimates in "On Isis and Osiris",

It is a fact, Clea, that having a beard and wearing a coarse cloak does not make philosophers, nor does dressing in linen and shaving the hair make votaries of Isis; but the true votary of Isis is he who, when he has legitimately received what is set forth in the ceremonies connected with these gods, uses reason in investigating and in studying the truth contained therein.

We must treat words for what they are, de-fined (corrupted) tools to help us manage reality with an eye to refining our reality that which is "pure and uncorrupted".

We can then reason that since SATAN is said to be "the Bringer of Light", fused often to the operative mythologies associated with "the Illuminatus", we can reason that the formula of "U/NATUS" is properly solved as follows:

NAT(U/U)S = NAT(U/U=1=A)S = SATAN

The rules for using Roman Numberals are not so well documented in "profane" or "public" literature, and for good reason. First, it is a Key to the whole riddle. Second, it is wholly foreign to the current ruling order, which takes its cues from Jehovian aka "Jewish/Rabbinical" energy sources, and as such, is part of what this energy source seeks to destroy, for what is in play is a planned and forceful attempt to destroy a "Construct".

Crowley hints around the use of Roman Numerals, and various Masonic influenced writers more on the side of "light" have hinted around the importance of Roman Numerals.

The fact that the value of the Roman Numbering System reveals 1,666, and that "666" is the "Sum of 1:36", and that "36" is a "Secret Number of Isis" all play roles in the revelation.

For instance, ISIS can be shown to be

ISIS = 9+19+9+19 = 56 = 19+16+5+5+3+8 = SPEECH

While ORIRIS can be shown to be

OSIRIS = 15+19+9+18+9+19 = 89 = 18+5+12+9+7+9+15+14 = RELIGION

Hence the marriage is between ISIS as "speech" and Osiris as "religion", but more accurately "of or pertaining to the Word" as a product of the "written components".

It takes both "male and female" to ascertain how "the Truth" as an esoteric construct was crafted. It is based on a "conceptual", and you cannot divorce Isis as an oral component from Osiris as the written component, for conception and conceptual are roots of the same philosophic.

[edit on 28-5-2007 by TheFetch]

That would just be a crazy mans equation.

I'm not getting your point here?

At the heart of the matter is the verbalisation of how "speculative" Initiatory schools (aka Secret Societies) craft and or graft their philosophical systems set against "number". Each of the various letters of any given Alphabet can more accurately be defined as an imbedded philosophical system.

Hebrew and Greek are known to be considered so, but spending our time in research of these Alphabetical Systems do not necessarily enable us to view the nature of how the Construct was crafted.

Once we come to an understanding that "an acroamatic cipher" is indeed a plausible reality, we then realise that the operative mythologies are but clues and stories encoding the archetypical nature of the Alphabet.

From this viewpoint, we can understand the mythology of Seth who kills Osiris, for Osiris being the "Pyramid Letter" is the Letter A while Seth is the Letter I, who screams "I am the One god~!" The confusion is that both A is 1 and hence Osiris is the operative "Lord of All", while Jehovah screams just as loud, "I am the Lord of All".

Since both A and I share values of "1" in a large gematria system, for surely 1 is I in Roman Systems and 1 is shaped as I, the quest is to ascertain who is 'the devil' or that which embodies true evil, and that which "brings Light", as in the Eye of the Pyramid as encoded into the Letter A.

There is a willful and designed confusion that needs to be recognized and ascertained. Otherwise, one swims in the sea as a fish in a school, darting this way or that as outer forces impose its presence on the larger and collective body of fish (humans).

So who really is "the Lord of All"?

Obviously it is "the Letter A", but as "Speculative Masonry" hints without revealing, this belief must be "proven".

So the Formulas as written is precisely designed to appear as a form of confused reasoning, for you have to then take the formula and reason it out.

For instance - if you know that "A" is "the Lord of All", how do you "prove it" with some sense of logic and reason?

We can provide you with clues.

Consider this clue from Plutarch's Isis and Osiris:

For Isis is a Greek word,6 and so also is Typhon, her enemy, who is conceited, as his name implies,6 because of his ignorance and self-deception. He tears to pieces and scatters to the winds the sacred writings, which the goddess collects and puts together and gives into the keeping of those that are initiated into the holy rites, since this consecration, by a strict regimen and by abstinence from many kinds of food and from the lusts of the flesh, curtails licentiousness and the love of pleasure, and induces a habit of patient submission to the stern and rigorous services in shrines,[red] the end and aim of which is the knowledge of Him who is the First, the Lord of All, the Ideal One.7 Him does the god urge us to seek, since He is near her and with her and in close communion.[/red]

Now see this same philosophic encoded into the U.S. Dollar Bill.



So the OWL is the Goddess in "close proximity to he who is "the Lord of All", which is "the 1", but is this "the Jewish god called Jehovah/Typhon/Seth", or is this "Osiris"?

The A or the I?