posted on May, 16 2007 @ 08:54 AM
Those photos look to me like a long exposure with a light source waved in front of the lens, and then the scene was fully illuminated with a seperate
flash unit which then also show the people like a normal photograph, frozen in an instant.
If you try to do something like that during the day then it will over-expose the film/CCD. So it just happens the pics could only be taken at
night?
Also, the shots of the UFO's are most likely fake, just ask any air-show photographer. A camera will automatically calulate the correct expouse by
measuring the amount of light coming in through the lens at various pre-defined metering points. So if you point the camera up at the sky to
photograph a plane, then the camera is going to adjust the exposure so that the sky is the proper colour and brightness, not the plane that takes up
only 5% of the frame. You can get around this by altering the exposure compensation values, which can result in an over-exposed (bright white) sky, or
you can use 'spot-metering' mode, which tells the camera to only measure the amount of light coming through the exact middle of the picture, so then
all you have to do is place the aircraft exactly in the middle of the frame, and it will expose correctly.
As you can see in the first UFO picture, the underside of the disk is well exposed, i.e. you can see details, while at the bottom of the frame the
mountains are completely black! Hmm . . .
The photographs of the 'objects not seen with naked eye' seem real, going by the sun rays and reflections. But they look like newspapers, so who am
I to judge?