It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FBI's Mueller: Bin Laden Wants to Strike U.S. Cities With Nuclear Weapons

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 15 2007 @ 11:50 PM
link   
InSpiteOf: Sorry if I seemed agressive.



some "terrorist groups" are really guerilla fighters locked in desperate military conflict against an entrenched military and state apparatus. they are labelled terrorists to demoralize and delegitimize they're struggle. Labelling all "terrorist groups" as morons i think is very inacurate.

You're right, but the terrorists groups doing it for the only purpose of killing people or for religious reasons are morans. When it comes to defend their homeland from invader it's ok or to fight a corrupt government.


Im well aware of the governments lack of caring for the common citizen, but not because of immigration issues.

It's a ``immigration`` issue, because it's ILLEGAL immigration, along with all the problems that it creates, but as you said it, it's another subject.



To name a few. North Korea. China. Russia. As for why. I think a destabilised America would strengthen their position as world powers. I think RedGolem sums it up nicely in the above post.

Today you'll learn something that will make you say that what you just said was ignorant, not an insult, just saying.

Do you know that from analysis of the radioactive fallout they can know where it was enriched? In which facility even, so they would know the country who gave a nuke. Of course they could said they ``lost`` it but intelligence reports would know the chances of that being true or not. If China would give a nuke of their own to some terrorist group, if it's not traced all the way by CIA/NSA, they'll know that China engaged in war against the US... and that is not good for them. That's why it's HIGHLY improbable if not impossible because of fear of consequences of doing that sort of things. Unless they plan a surprise attack right after the detonations... but you would then talk about nuclear war... that's why it's ignorant to say that China or Russia would give a nuke to some terrorist group.



posted on May, 16 2007 @ 12:05 AM
link   
Hey Vitch,

True, they can trace it to reactors that produced the substance....

thus is why i believe the next atomic explosion will be from russian materials.

The amount of munitions and materials that were unsecured after the fall of the Soviet Union leads me to believe someone got something through the blackmarket.. and will smuggle it to either the US, Israel or the Greenzone in Baghdad.

This will be traced to Russia, but zip 'militarily' will be done, because its well known in the world the state of affairs after the fall of the soviet union.

They arent to blame for the explosion, but they are liable for its security.



posted on May, 16 2007 @ 05:32 AM
link   
the Men and Women that created the United States were terrorists until they won the revolutionary war. Had they lost, all would be hung, lose their holding, etc.

Being labeled a terrorist or freedom fighter depends if you win the conflict.


in 4 years FDR was able to effectively create a war strategy with Allies that won a WORLD WAR.

in 4 years, we have flailed about blindly, invaded a nation that had nothing to do with terrorism, created a situation where we are expending massive amounts of Capital ( blood and money ) with little to no return.

Are there terrorists..? yep you bet. did we respond to 9/11 appropriately...? No we did not.



posted on May, 16 2007 @ 07:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by Vitchilo



Do you know that from analysis of the radioactive fallout they can know where it was enriched? In which facility even, so they would know the country who gave a nuke. Of course they could said they ``lost`` it but intelligence reports would know the chances of that being true or not.


For this to be a deterrent you would half to believe that mutual assured destruction is the deterrent. All through the cold war MAD worked with both China and Russia. Both understood what it meant and what it will do to a society. Now with the religious terrorists, you really think MAD will work? Some senior religious officials have been quoted to saying something to the efect that they would be hurt in a nuclear exchange but they would survive. That is pretty close to being paramont to saying MAD is not even a factor.



posted on May, 16 2007 @ 08:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by Helig
Fascinating stuff, seems every week we hear about how badly Osama and his buddies want to blow us up, poison our water, kill our children and steal our ice cream, yet it still hasn't happened. Seriously how many times now have we been told that an attack is just around the corner yet it fails to materialize? I personally think it was a one-time deal where they got lucky as hell, cause if they really had the amazing resources that we keep being told they do and all these units within the US then why haven't they attacked again? What exactly are they waiting for, a telegram from Allah telling them its the right time to hit again?



EXACTLY!

its a lot of rubbish to justfy repression and spying.

..
the SECRET POLICE can say and make anything up...

they have been spouting this rubbish for years now...and their mass media pimps too...



posted on May, 16 2007 @ 11:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by Vitchilo
InSpiteOf: Sorry if I seemed agressive.

Its cool, its a passionate subject.



You're right, but the terrorists groups doing it for the only purpose of killing people or for religious reasons are morans. When it comes to defend their homeland from invader it's ok or to fight a corrupt government.

agreed in full.




Do you know that from analysis of the radioactive fallout they can know where it was enriched? In which facility even, so they would know the country who gave a nuke.


I personally didnt know this. Thanks for the info.



posted on May, 16 2007 @ 12:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
How many times have we heard this EXACT same thing?

Nukes, alqaeda, osama, nukes, american cities, alqaeda, wants, wishes, nukes, alqaeda..

SCARE TACTICS!


Just like so called psychics and visionaries, if you make enough claims and predictions some of them are bound to come true.

And then when something even remotely happens they point back to one of a million things they claimed, "we told you so."

[edit on 16-5-2007 by Realtruth]



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join