It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by defcon5
Originally posted by jsobecky
Having a piece of ID that contains biometric data and is accessible by another country violates your religious beliefs? Really? I find that incredulous.
Not really, go read some of my posts above, and in other threads on the topic of the “mark of the beast”, and you’ll understand where I am coming from, even if you don’t have the exact same beliefs.
Sure it does, that is the whole point, the states either comply, or they find themselves unable to receive federal funding and support. The fact this is being rammed down all of our throats, as it is, should be another warning sign to folks as to its true intention. If it was really a harmless piece of legislation, then they would not be using the type of threatening language they have been to enforce it.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Up to this point it has been entirely possible to live without a drivers license, folks do it all the time. They either are too old to drive, have lost it from some infraction, are not old enough to have one, and so on. These folks have had no problem living. However can you say its going to be the same way after May 2008-Jan 2009? No you cannot, as it absolutely will not be the same. Everyone will be required to have one of these, from a child to an elderly person, and it makes no difference if they are a driver or not. You must have one, or you cannot interact with the Federal Government. You cannot pay taxes, pay or receive Social Security, retain a Job, interact with a bank, pay your bills, drive a car, utilize public transportation, and so on. How can you say this is the same system we have in place right now, it is obviously not the case. The state can still issue ID, but it will not be accepted by anyone, especially employers and banks.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Originally posted by Shar
For one thing look above. Read a couple of post above yours.
For another thing just type in real id act and you'll find all the information you need.
I still don't see it. To be honest, I think you may be misinterpreting it, because nowhere have I read that we will need one of these cards to access our money.
If you can't provide the exact wording, instead of just telling me to google it, I'll just have to chalk it up to fear-mongering.
After December 31, 2009, "a Federal agency may not accept, for any official purpose, a driver's license or identification card issued by a state to any person unless the state is meeting the requirements" specified in the Real ID Act. States remain free to also issue non-complying licenses and ID's, so long as these have a unique design and a clear statement that they cannot be accepted for any Federal identification purpose. The federal Transportation Security Administration is responsible for security check-in at airports, so bearers of non-compliant documents would no longer be able to travel on common carrier aircraft without additional screening
In addition, the federal Social Security Administration, (42 U.S.C. § 666(28)), requires the States to maintain a new hire directory. Employers would no longer be able to accept, or ultimately hire, bearers of non-compliant documents for employment.
Also, financial institutions are required to assist the Federal Parent Locator Service, ((42 U.S.C. § 666(17)). Financial institutions would require compliant documents from all customers. Bearers of non-compliant documents would be denied financial or banking services
It will use common machine-readable technology, with defined minimum data elements (the details of which are not spelled out, but left to the Secretary of Homeland Security,
Originally posted by Shar
Ok go into your bank today and just try and open up an account without your license or picture id. It’s not going to happen. A bank is a Federal Agency. Their no longer allowed to accept your drivers license. Therefore you won’t be able to get your money. Any time I go to the bank right now my license has always been ok to prove who I am. Later, it won’t be ok.
NineSquared,
What is your definition of "federal agency"? Because banks are private institutions.
Originally posted by Shar
Well I'm glad it don't bother you. Your fine with all this. Some of us like me, well I'm very concerned about it all.
I;m down for it as long as the new ID's do not have any bio data, chips or anything else that could possibly be used against us for tracking ot whatever else.
Originally posted by Shar
NineSquared,
What is your definition of "federal agency"? Because banks are private institutions.
Hum, does FDIC not mean anything to you. The banks will follow what the government says.