Creating a Catch-33: No Matter What, They Win

Ok, so what do I mean by this cryptic thread title?

Im talking about our current war time status, how we got there, and why we'll stay there.

SO lets say you are sitting in the board room with your super-elitist NWO buddies. You decide that, for whatever reason, you want there to be disorder, chaos, and uncertainty in the world on a large scale. You decide that you want the US involved in war, and you want it to stay there....

The following was secretly recorded at a NWO-USA Chapter meeting. Many men lost their lives to bring you this.

Ok. Good plan. How are we gonna do that?

Well, first we need to come up with a way to get the ball rolling somehow (9/11), and once the ball starts rolling, we need to keep it rolling.

Well, geez Mr. Im-In-Charge-and-Know-Everything... how do we do that?

Create a catch-22 scenario. We create an enemy that the US public will hate and fear. That will create a camp of the public that wish to keep us at war. We ride that wave as long as we can.

Ok... ok... I see how that could work. But eventually, they are gonna want to stop the war, right?

Thats when the catch 22 is made evident. We say we cant stop the war because then the enemy will have safe haven and will become so strong that they will come after us.

This will keep anybody from pulling us out of war.

But at some point down the road, we will be forced to pull out right? Surely, thats inevitable...

Yes thats true. Thats when the catch-22 becomes a catch-33! We allow/create another attack on the homeland, and then we are back at the begining, going to war!! Once the other NWO chapters see how well this works, I betchya theyll want a slice of the action too. I bet we can get 3 or 4 countries into it next time!! Dude that is gonna be the biggest, coolest war ever!

Man, you are so freaking smart. No wonder you get the big chair in the board room!

Heh heh. Ok, so did everybody get their NWO T-Shirts? I want everybody to wear em when we go meet NWO-Russia on the subs under the ice cap next week. Dude, they are gonna be so jealous!

Yeah, but NWO-Britain has those cool hats. Did you see those things out at the Grove last year??

Yeah, those hats are pretty sweet...



Seriously though, do you see my point? The above was obviously a fictional dialouge, but I could see a conversation similar to that taking place back in 1999 or so. They have created a wheel that will keep rolling... for a while...

What is your take on this concept, and how do you think the cycle can be broken? And what do you think they have already come up with to bust your cycle-breaking ideas? We should be able to discuss this for a few pages.

IMHO & $.02

[edit on 5/4/2007 by damajikninja]

Sounds an awful lot like how I imagine the PNAC think tank meetings unfolded.

Hehehe, good job though. Had me there for a while

You're pretty spot on though, in theory the enemy could remain fared and hated for a long long time to come though.

They've got this thing buttoned up pretty tight IMO. Surely they have been planning this for years. I dont think any of us doubt that. The brilliance of their dasterdly plan is what is so sickening. I mean they really have engineered a world wide situation that is playing right into their hands, no matter what turn it takes.

I have no doubt that good will somehow prevail over the evil, but the bad guys are certainly using their thinkers on this one.

.

[edit on 5-5-2007 by Isthistaken]

there.

[edit on 5-5-2007 by Isthistaken]

Originally posted by Isthistaken
Yeah, I know how that goes. Been there, done that.

Dude, sounds like you have a story! Do tell! That is, if you feel it is safe to do so.

Why did you delete your posts? I was really interested in what you had to say. Did you feel it was unsafe to leave those comments up there?

Bush Warns: Give Troops
Resources or Face Disaster

WASHINGTON — President Bush pulled no punches Thursday in warning congressional Democrats that failure to give U.S. troops in Iraq the resources they need to battle a rising Al Qaeda threat will lead to disaster.

"We should be able to agree that the consequences of failure in Iraq would be disastrous for our country," Bush said at the Pentagon after meeting with Defense Secretary Robert Gates and other military officials. "We should be able to agree that we have a responsibility to provide our men and women on the front lines the resources and flexibility they need to do the job we asked them to do."

Bush renewed his threat to veto a House bill up for a vote Thursday evening that would only provide funding through July.


SOURCE | FoxNews

This is exactly what I'm talking about... "We stay at war, OR ELSE!"

Catch 22/33

If I'm not mistaken, isn't it Catch-22 not 33?

Originally posted by Reform America
If I'm not mistaken, isn't it Catch-22 not 33?

You are correct - the common phrase is catch 22. I spun it off to Catch 33 because it is a 3 stage cycle.