Would there still be a conspiracy if>>>

1. 1,2 WTC didn't fall all the way completely down (like, maybe half of it tilted and fell off into the streets)

2. WTC 7 never fell, and if it did, not straight down

3. Shanksville's crash didnt head on impact into the ground, but had a slant on impact and left debris.

4. The impact at the Pentagon would have been much more bigger in damage.

Would you still be here today looking stuff up on this?

Yes - my suspicion of a conspiracy isn't contingent upon any of those events.

Of course, if you removed just those 4-5 occurrences and none of the 200+ coincidences and internal failures, it still proves the US was at the very least complicit in the attacks.

[edit on 30-4-2007 by BrokenVisage]

Originally posted by coughymachine
Yes - my suspicion of a conspiracy isn't contingent upon any of those events.

True, mine comes from the events leading up to and following this fateful day. That's why I even started looking at any of it at all in the first place. Like most of the 'official story' believers I did believe what I saw on TV was as told. At the time that is. Only because my judgment was clouded by my anger and shock that I was feeling. I then directed that anger and shock towards the evil terrorists that pulled it off and it took me almost 5 years to really start to question anything. Like most Americans I simply accepted it and went about my life trying to take care of my family.

I just woke myself up and broke away from the hypnotic trance.