It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mr Mxyztplk
Originally posted by tsloan
I hate to say it but no he shouldn't have. His contract states that he can be just what he is..An idiot,
An idiot yes, but the kind of idiot that knows where the line is. Imus crossed that line to the point that advertisers no longer wanted to be associated with him, so he got fired, and rightfully so. No one could be so stupid to think that he didn’t cross the invisible line, coming out with a racial insult on air Is just a out and out dumb thing to do.
He was fired because his advertisers refused to purchase any more spots on his show.
MSNBC is only there to make money, Imus went from making money to being a social pariah because of what he said and no one wants to be around him.
…MSNBC have the right to fire Imus on what he said..NO. Not according to the contract.
I haven’t read Imus’s contract but I find it hard to believe that any company would be dumb enough to sign a contract with out an out clause for the company to cover something like this.
I support free radio without FCC or any other over site…/buttons are on a T.V./Radio for a reason.If you don't like it turn
First I don’t think that you quit understand what the FCC does, not only do they censor what is allowed on TV or radio but the also assign the channels to companies on the radio TV and cell phones with out that control there would be chaos on the airwaves.
As for censorship of content, consider this, The Simpsons has a viewing rang from age 8 to people in their mid 30’s, do you think that stations should advertise product with adult content like “Girls gone wild”? would you want your kid to see that? I do think that the rules need to be loosened but they do need to be in place. After 11pm anything should go but before that rules should apply.
edit to fix quotes.
[edit on 6-5-2007 by Mr Mxyztplk]
Originally posted by semperfortis
[...]I could almost agree except for the sheer substantiation of the numbers..
22 million people can't all be wrong..
[..]
Semper
Originally posted by grover
[...]
When are people like you going to realize that it is one thing for a group (blacks, gays, women, Chinese, what not) to address each other in stereotypical and derogatory slang as a form a patter or trash talking and it is another thing entirely for someone outside to do the same? It is not a black thing. Two gay men will refer to each other as faggot or queer, or two women as bitch just as two blacks will refer to each other using the N word BUT just you try and refer to those same two women for example as bitches and they will tear your eyes out. It is a way of taking the sting, the hate out out of the words until someone like you comes along and thinks hey they call each other N all the time so why can't I? It is simply not the same and never will be but I doubt you have the nuanced mind to understand that.
[...]
Numbers make something right?
What about nazi-germany in the 40's?
What about the people in iran?
What about the american killing the Indians a couple of hundred years ago?
What about slavery? So many millions of white slave owners wrong???
I think I've made my point!
Originally posted by Aldolas
Numbers make something right?
What about nazi-germany in the 40's?
What about the people in iran?
What about the american killing the Indians a couple of hundred years ago?
What about slavery? So many millions of white slave owners wrong???
I think I've made my point!