Karmic Retribution
I understand the appeal of "karma" and "peer moderation" systems and think they can work well under the right circumstances, but I'm very much
opposed to them on ATS.
ATS isn't a community founded on social approval of member opinions.
It's okay to be different here, even to the point of being "disruptive" -- provided the "disruption" takes the form of offering points of view
that other members may not be comfortable with, rather than violating the rules of membership.
I've used quotation marks around the word "disruption" in this case because on ATS the only true form disruption can take involves
T&C violations.
The ATS staff is prohibited from taking any action against any member which is not clearly justified by the
T&C.
"Karma" systems are not subject to such restrictions and are therefore typically used to encourage conformity and stifle dissent.
Such systems, by their very nature, are incompatible with the values of a community which promotes independent thought.
The rules governing our membership are not perfect, but they have been refined over time and work very well when they are followed.
Without exception, every example of genuine disruption I've seen in over two and a half years on ATS has been effectively resolved by applying the
terms & conditions.
How To Throw Back Red Herrings
Though it's not possible to prevent members in good standing from posting "red herrings" and derailing threads, it is possible to respond quickly
to such disruptions and minimize their impact.
It is also possible to prevent members who repeatedly violate the
T&C from
posting in the first place, but we try to reserve that sort of action for cases where all reasonable alternatives have been exhausted.
The moderator staff is here to help members and promote candid, civil topical discussion, but doing so would be impossible without the cooperation and
assistance of the community as a whole.
To that end, all members can help. All you need to do is:
1. Honor the
AboveTopSecret.com Terms And Conditions Of Use. Read (or at least
skim through) them now and then. They are the laws of our land.
2. Stay on topic, even if other members digress. Disruptors can't drive a thread off topic if no one takes the bait.
3. Be courteous, especially when others are not. When a member flies off the handle and starts hurling insults, compounding the problem by following
suit only makes things exponentially worse. Take the high road and don't get dragged into the mud. Instead...
4.
Notify the staff when there are problems. Disruptors can't disrupt
anything if they can't post. Members who repeatedly violate the rules forfeit the privilege of posting to our forums. Want revenge? Report
violations.
The staff won't take any action that isn't justified by the evidence and the
T&C, but the nature of discussion forums is such that when the evidence is
there, it is irrefutable.
Those who habitually disrupt topical discussion convict themselves with their own words.
Working The System
I'm not suggesting that changes to the way we do things would necessarily be wrong or are out of the question. There is always room for
improvement.
However, I've seen this process work far too many times to agree that experimental changes with a debatable track record in other venues should take
precedence over doing what I know works.
My advice to any member who is unsatisfied with the current system of moderation is to try the suggestions I've offered here before dismissing them
as ineffective, and to be patient when doing so.
After all, even the most ingenious "karma" system wouldn't solve every problem overnight.