It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bokinsmowl
its like telling kids fires are dangerous and then putting an open flame in every classroom. kind of hypocritical huh? do as i say not as i do mentality. maybe instead of giving teachers guns we get them to teach kids that guns aren't the answer.
guns are dangerous, as adults we know this, but i dont think enough information is out there for children. some times the best answer isn't to hide things from kids but to bring it out in the open and encourage an understanding of the situation.
guns are unfortunately a necessary evil and keeping it taboo just creates an overwhelming curiosity and kids may investigate on their own...usually ending up learning the hard way.
we teach kids about safe sex, why not firearm responsibility as well.
[edit on 4/20/2007 by bokinsmowl]
Originally posted by chissler
This notion that kids today are worse than they were ten, twenty, or thirty years ago is a joke in my opinion. Kids today are just as messed up as they were at any point in time. Kids misbehave, they disobey, they "do their own thing" just like every other generation. While this generation might be taking it a little farther, it is still no different. The only thing that has changed is the way the media represents it. School shootings like Virginia Tech, Dawson College, and Columbine are never far from our minds. So when some little "punk" disrespects us on the sidewalk, we quickly paint them with the same brush.
The same "punks" were disobedient years ago, only we didn't have the media driving it down our throats.
Society has changed, the media has changed, technology has changed, almost everything has changed. But kids are kids, and they've been kids for as long as any of us can remember.
Originally posted by Deus_Brandon
Anyways, back on topic. I do agree with you that there needs to be classes offered in high school how how to operate a pistol and use it and most of all the dangers that can become of its' misusages.
Originally posted by whaaa
The real tough guy/girls would have no trouble whatsoever in taking a gun away from some candyass teacher. Then you would have a problem.
If you want safer schools? Institute a mental health program that can get the crazies the help they need or at least locked up.
Sorry, no money for mental health facilities. We got a war on terror to fight.
While the American infrastructure crumbles into decay and everyone hides in their fortified homes and homeschools their kids into ignorance.
Welcome to the Monkey House!!
[edit on 22-4-2007 by whaaa]
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by Deus_Brandon
Anyways, back on topic. I do agree with you that there needs to be classes offered in high school how how to operate a pistol and use it and most of all the dangers that can become of its' misusages.
WTH happened?
The worst is back when you could walk down a high school hallway and fins a rifle and a box of ammo in every other locker there werent any school shootings and the gang land kids had knife fights. Now the guns are demonized and evil and kids are shooting kids all over the place.
Tell me how that works.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
This kind of brings up another issue thats been on my mind for some time now. What happened to all of the school rifle teams?
Originally posted by nerbot
Don't be so ridiculous, teachers with guns!!!!!!!!
How many teachers get pissed off? LOTS
Why should it be their responsibility? SHOULDN'T
Is an institution with a gun in each classroom safe? ABSOLUTELY NOT
How many pissed off kids would want that gun? LOTS
Prevention is better than cure
I could go on but I won't.....
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I think metal detectors and tighter security would be a good move toward preventing guns in schools. However, the students would probably resort to other methods.
And I wouldn't mind SOME teachers having guns, carried on them at all times. But I think they should have to go through some professional evaluation to qualify.
Both of these measures only deal with symptoms of the problem, though and if it's going to be solved, a lot more attention needs to be paid to WHY kids want to kill people...
Originally posted by elderban
Arm the teachers is all fine and dandy until some teacher goes nuts and kills 32 students, then everyone will be saying "Take the guns away from the teachers!".
I do like the idea of a "School Marshall", though. We do have police officers at our schools here (called "Resource Officers"), but I'm not sure if they're armed or not.