It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
April 19, 2007 - The results are now in. Whoever becomes president on Jan. 20, 2009, the next leader of the free world may face a task akin to taking over command of the Titanic. After the iceberg.That is the message behind a new multinational survey, released this week by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs and WorldPublicOpinion.org, which showed that nations around the world reject the idea that the United States should play the role of preeminent world leader. A majority of respondents polled in 15 countries, representing about 56 percent of the world’s population (the survey included China, India and Russia), also said the United States cannot be trusted any longer "to act responsibly in the world." As Richard Holbrooke, the former U.N. ambassador, sums it up bluntly: “No president will ever have handed over a worse international situation than George W. Bush.”The current results contrast markedly with surveys taken at the end of the '90s. Even as recently as 2002 (before the invasion of Iraq, in other words), a Pew survey found that despite criticisms of U.S. policy, a decade after the collapse of the Soviet Union, most people accepted a one-superpower world, if grudgingly. Even in countries that have since become virulently anti-American, like Jordan, Egypt and Russia, majorities back then concluded that “the world is safer with the United States as the lone superpower,” the survey noted. To compare 1999 State Department data with recent surveys by the Pew Trust, favorable views of the United States have dropped in Britain from 83 percent to 56 percent, in Germany from 78 percent to 37 percent, in Morocco from 77 percent to 49 percent, in Indonesia from 75 to 30 percent, in France from 62 to 39 percent, in Turkey from 62 to 12 percent and in Spain from 50 to 23 percent.
Originally posted by BlackOps719
I believe that we have created a ticking time bomb in the middle east that will one day go off in our faces, and the sad part is most of us stood by and ignored the actions of our rogue and corrupt government while they played God with these peoples lives and families in order to stuff their own pockets.
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
Saddam Hussein ...I think the day we sentenced him to death was the day we sentenced ourselves to big problems in the future.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
The IRAQIs sentenced him. Not us.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
Saddam Hussein ...I think the day we sentenced him to death was the day we sentenced ourselves to big problems in the future.
The IRAQIs sentenced him. Not us.
As for the question - How do we fix 'W's mess .... VOTE and get involved. That's the way America works. If you think G.W. has screwed up America then vote out those who suport him. Get yourself involved with groups and projects that are opposite of what G.W. stand for if you think he's screwed things up.
Originally posted by Vekar
To fix the nation is to espunge the corporations and the politicians and beurocrats they put in office. Then to overhaul the system and clean house with the laws that are lax on corporations and settup a "0 tolerance" system towards them and politicians.....
Summary: It will take a divine miracle to swing things around without falling into a state of revolution. Corruption has gone SO deep it is truely a nightmare for those who want to fix it.
"In the CNN age, when indelible impressions are instantaneously formed around the world and when wall street and it's foreign counterparts can bring policy makers to their knees overnight "
"The task is much more complicated and difficult than Clinton makes it out. First the president has not prepared the nation for the sacrifices that lie ahead if America's trajectory is to turn upward.
Second, he has yet to explain the complex obstacles to restarting the American economy when there is a recession in Japan and Europe.
Third, he has yet to confront the delicate problem of pleasing powerful financial markets which are all too ready to unleash their fury at the administration's first fiscal misstep.
Now that the election is over the new president will have to move quickly to deliver the tough message and make agonizing decisions. In the CNN age, when indelible impressions are instantaneously formed around the world and when wall street and it's foreign counterparts can bring policy makers to their knees overnight Clinton's first hundred days are not just an opportunity to unfold a new agenda, rather they just as equally present a mine field that could blow up and damage his administration for the next four years.
Clinton's immediate priorities should be both offensive and defensive and defined in terms that are crystal clear and that reduce the cancerous budget deficit."
Originally posted by RRconservative
Well we certainly can't fix this so-called mess by throwing in the towel and cutting off funds to the troops. You haven't seen a mess until that happens. But I'm sure once it does, and MILLIONS of people are killed, they will try to blame that on Bush also.
You liberals think you are so open-minded, but all you are doing is parroting the media talking points.
Newsweek thinks the war is going badly? What a freaking surprise! When was the last time Newsweek printed a story about any of the many good things going on in Iraq?
posted by clearwater
As goes Russia, so goes the rest of the world. Putin's strong arm tactics are the only thing standing between their electoral government and criminal elements unabashedly running the entire show. [Edit by Don W]