Asbestos fireproofing would have prevented the destruction of WTC towers

Berlau’s report of the post-Sept. 11 fireproofing testing by NIST underscores the chilling possibility that the Sept. 11 WTC building destruction may have been delayed if not preventable had asbestos fireproofing been used.

Source
The debate about asbestos is now truly over. This article is the last nail in the coffin of antiasbestospseudoecologists.

The WTC towers were not brought down by fires.

All the floors below the 77th and the 93th floors of the towers were totally undamaged, and the towers would have never collapsed entirely, and in such a symmetrical manner, without the use of explosives. Moreover, the NIST report ignored the presence of the building's central core, the structural backbone of the towers.

WTC 7 took unsubstantial damage from the collapse of the two towers and its fires have not propagated enough to cause relevant structural weakening.

Also , asbestos has been scientifically proven to be terribly hasardous for healt, and thousands of citizens in many North American cities have filed massive class actions against construction companies about it since the '80s.

You are being misguided...

[edit on 14/4/07 by Echtelion]