It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tunin
My theory is, solar flares are increasing, within that, Earth is suffering a lot of changes.
Call me crazy, but I think Earth is going away from the sun mainly because the incidence of light is increasing. Once I saw a theory about the equilibrium of the celestial bodies, it states that it isn't maintained by their masses but by their emission of "light".
Maybe we should see if this is happening to other planets too, if there's some kind of correlation.
.
Originally posted by dgtempe
Do we end up somewhere else? Would we be aware? Would it happen in seconds or days or months?
Originally posted by Alien42
Do you think that this could be why earth's magnetic field is weakening, and that the birds dying, could have something to do with changes in the magnetic field?
Maybe I'm an idiot, but it seems like they may be related.
Earth's Slowing Rotation
It is a known fact that the rotation of the Earth is gradually slowing. For four and one half billion years, its entire life, it has been slowing down. As the Earth loses its kinetic energy due to all forms of friction acting on it (tides, galactic space dust, etc.) like any other flywheel, it will slow down. From time to time our timekeepers must adjust their super accurate atomic clocks to synchronize them with the Earth's slowing rotation whose day/night cycles we base our lives on.
Scientists estimate that the Earth's rotation is slowing at the rate of 2.2 seconds every 100,000 years. The time it takes the Earth to complete one rotation increases 2.2 seconds every 100,000 years. This is a very conservative figure considering the number of adjustments our timekeepers have been forced to make in recent years. If we trace this phenomenon back in time, whatever the correct figure is, at one point in time it may have taken the Earth 12 hours to complete one rotation, (depending on its initial speed of rotation when it was created.) At that time the Earth was spinning at twice the speed it is traveling at the present time.
The constant gravitational force and the weakening angular momentum caused by the slowing of the Earth's rotation has had a profound effect on the Earth's geophysical activity throughout the ages. Throughout the life of the Earth there has been a continual adjusting of the Earth's shape as the ratio of the strengths of angular momentum and gravity has changed. Gravity is a centripetal force, it exerts its tremendous force inward, toward the center of gravity, always trying to form the Earth into a perfect sphere.
Originally posted by TheDuckster
Just courious...would it matter if we had a moon in orbit at all?
Any effect?
Originally posted by Alien42
Do you think that this could be why earth's magnetic field is weakening, and that the birds dying, could have something to do with changes in the magnetic field?
Maybe I'm an idiot, but it seems like they may be related.
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Byrd, do you you think the earth would move at all without the moon? I mean, rotation and wobble is about the only movement the earth makes. Without a wobble I don't see it rotating either.
Originally posted by Byrd
And there are deliberate attempts to kill birds on large scale in some urban areas (starlings and grackles and pigeons... I've seen municipalities put out poison bait for grackles and not care that other birds get into it.)
Originally posted by Byrd
Oh yes. We have other planets in the solar system that move (and rotate) without moons. Mercury... Venus... Mars (the two 'moons' are little more than small asteroids captured by the planet). Rotation came from the initial accretion disk (the stuff that the planets were made from was orbiting around the sun. As it lumped together to form planets, the spin remained... rotation was caused by impact of larger fragments.
What it means
Solar Rotation Effects on the Thermospheres of Mars and Earth
Jeffrey M. Forbes,1* Sean Bruinsma,2 Frank G. Lemoine3
The responses of Earth's and Mars' thermospheres to the quasi-periodic (27-day) variation of solar flux due to solar rotation were measured contemporaneously, revealing that this response is twice as large for Earth as for Mars. Per typical 20-unit change in 10.7-centimeter radio flux (used as a proxy for extreme ultraviolet flux) reaching each planet, we found temperature changes of 42.0 ± 8.0 kelvin and 19.2 ± 3.6 kelvin for Earth and Mars, respectively. Existing data for Venus indicate values of 3.6 ± 0.6 kelvin. Our observational result constrains comparative planetary thermosphere simulations and may help resolve existing uncertainties in thermal balance processes, particularly CO2 cooling.
Originally posted by AlabamaCajun
A polar shift would more than likely disrupt a lot of electronics with fluctuations in the normal and mostly stable magnetic field.
Originally posted by AlabamaCajun
For the outward creep?, If you consider the tonnage of mass converted to energy and emitted as an array of particles blasting outward, then out old friend Sol is loosing weight over time and thus would have a shrinking gravity well.
Originally posted by Matt_Mulder
we'll be toasted or frozen to death in only a couple million years from here !