It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by blue bird
Love this one lol!
*Skipper always have links and you can see what he does to image ( usually just colored for contrast)
While we're on the subject of tampering, you should know that any and all suggestion of these colossal monuments has been completely blotted out in the decades old Viking imaging (as evidenced in my fifth image below in this report) of this same area. Tellingly, that is the case even though these same monuments are clearly visible (remember that 12 miles across head size) in numerous more WIDE-ANGLE imaging strips as listed and linked below. In other words, now you see a 12-mile across massive object and now you don't. Even the most die hard loyal fan of official positioning should be able to recognize that there is something seriously wrong with such things happening in official science data.
M02-01454 ..... M03-00325 ..... M03-01568 ..... M03-06818 ..... M07-05293
M08-01075 ..... M09-01756 ..... M11-01039 ..... M15-01271 ..... M22-02033
All of the above listed wide-angle image strips plus the M02-0164 strip used here clearly demonstrates in multiple camera imaging events the presence of these anomalies. So their being missing from and being removed from the older Viking data tells us that someone knew about this massive monumental civilization evidence all the way back in at least the 1970's. Further, the now obscuring of this same evidence with gradually increased image tampering in the most recent "Extended" series of MOC imaging tells us that someone didn't like the idea of this being left out of the tampering and is gradually trying to increasingly obscure it and minimize it back into obscurity while at the same time trying to keep your attention via misdirection focussed on debates over more ambiguous and less resolvable material like the "Face" that conveniently never lead anywhere.
Originally posted by ArMaP
I know I may have some bad answers to this, but what I am suppose to see in that photo?
Edit to clarify.
This is the photo I was talking about.
Originally posted by ArMaP
That is the problem, to me it does not look like anything, it's just a brighter, maybe higher, area.
Edit: I forgot to say that it could also be a lower area.
[edit on 18/5/2007 by ArMaP]
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Seriously? You really don't see that there? it is so real that at first i thought i was seeing a poorly done photoshop.
Originally posted by ArMaP
I know I may have some bad answers to this, but what I am suppose to see in that photo?
I am not worried, I am only trying to understand what other people see. I could say "yes, I see it" just to please other people but I would be lying, I do not see anything that looks like a human head, so that is what I say.
Originally posted by zorgon
Just rocks, ArMaP, just rocks... don't worry about it
I am not, that is a problem I always had, that is why I sometimes rotate the images to try to see if is a depression or a raised area.
But I am surprised that you are still having trouble understanding raised areas from depressions