Quite impressive video of nuke experiment and WTC

Almost at the end of it the comparison of the picture its just impressive.

The immolated cars are a very very good point, and one I've not seen mentioned before. I can't think of any way the official story could explain that.. I'd be interested to hear if anyone else has any ideas, though.

What I fail to see is that it was a nuke. Part of the problem is that even a small nuclear device would have produced shockwaves and alot of radio active fallout that would have been detected either then or definately now, as such would have been noted in the personnel who was exposed at the time to ground zero. However, what the video may show is a large explosive force at work there.

Just my thoughts.

Originally posted by sdcigarpig
What I fail to see is that it was a nuke. Part of the problem is that even a small nuclear device would have produced shockwaves and alot of radio active fallout that would have been detected either then or definately now, as such would have been noted in the personnel who was exposed at the time to ground zero. However, what the video may show is a large explosive force at work there.

Just my thoughts.

I just wanted to remind you, you rely on the same people to inform you about said radiation that lied to you when they said the air was safe to breath.

'Earthquakes' were registered just prior to each building collapsing (shockwave of an underground/basement explosion..? )

As to other sources for information on fallout. I'll have a look into it, don't know of the top of my head.
Does a fusion/hydrogen bomb (as opposed to fission (nuke)) have the same radioactive fall-out?

I can't think of anything else then those 2 bombs that can atomize a large part of a concrete and steel building... atomize.
Also you need a large amount of heat to get the pyroclastic flow witnessed on 9/11.

So outside of fallout, to me above definitely leaves the possibility of a nuke or similar device open.

I usually don't speculate on the collapses themselves.. instead follow the papertrails that lead up to 9/11. But recently different theroies on nukes etc. have come to my attention and got me to thinking.

The factual evidence indicates that our government is using and has used 3rd or possibly 4th generation hydrogen bombs domestically and internationally. The evidence for international usage is not quite as strong as the domestic usage, but when domestic usage is considered, the international usage seems inescapable. The process of exclusion based on the known facts leaves only one viable option for the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings - a relatively pure hydrogen bomb.

www.thepriceofliberty.org...

Lots of good information on the possibility of micro-nukes being used on the WTC.

Originally posted by sdcigarpig
What I fail to see is that it was a nuke. Part of the problem is that even a small nuclear device would have produced shockwaves and alot of radio active fallout that would have been detected either then or definately now, as such would have been noted in the personnel who was exposed at the time to ground zero. However, what the video may show is a large explosive force at work there.

Just my thoughts.

When you think of a nuke what do you think of? You usually picture the ones from the 1940's and 1950's. First generation nukes. They were large. Fast forward 50 to 60 years. Think of how small we could make one of those now.

They blame the pulverized concrete and the steel that melted on the heat caused by the fire from the fuel of the planes. There's no possible way that fuel would have burnt long enough to create that much heat. Most of the fuel burnt up on impact. Jet fuel burns very fast. The only thing that could have melted steel like that have completely destroyed those cars like that would be some type of a small nuke.

Now think about all the cops and firefighters and citizens that got sick afterwards. FEMA admitted the air was polluted and didn't tell anyone. That pollution could have been radiation. People are still talking about how you can get sick from being in that area. My niece and nephew went to New York in 2004 and visited Ground Zero. Both of them came home sick a week later.