It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Time yourself in answering this relatively EASY math question!!!

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 28 2007 @ 11:57 PM
link   
Before answering the following math question, have access to a clock, watch, or preferably a stop-watch. Do not read further until you obtained one of these instruments. But you want to move on because you are a fast reader. Stop!!! Obtain a time-piece. Also, skip over other peoples' replies as they would bias the test. Read only this original thread before answering!!!




Which 3 numbers under a 1,000 have both 3 and 103 as factors? How long did it take you? Be honest!!!



posted on Mar, 30 2007 @ 03:22 AM
link   
30-34 seconds

618
309
927

[edit on 30-3-2007 by Kristol n Stauss]



posted on Mar, 30 2007 @ 03:52 AM
link   
That took me like 1 second

3, 103, and 309



posted on Mar, 30 2007 @ 04:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by ben91069
That took me like 1 second

3, 103, and 309


Urrm, unless im having a dense day, thats not the answer
or did i read the Q wrong?



posted on Mar, 30 2007 @ 04:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kristol n Stauss

Originally posted by ben91069
That took me like 1 second

3, 103, and 309


Urrm, unless im having a dense day, thats not the answer
or did i read the Q wrong?


Yes, I did read it wrong. I thought it was asking for 3 numbers with those factors instead it asks for 3 numbers with both those factors.

I noticed that after I posted it, but thought it would be cheesy to just delete my post. I knew someone would call me on it. See.....you are very special.



posted on Mar, 30 2007 @ 04:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by ben91069

Originally posted by Kristol n Stauss

Originally posted by ben91069
That took me like 1 second

3, 103, and 309


Urrm, unless im having a dense day, thats not the answer
or did i read the Q wrong?


Yes, I did read it wrong. I thought it was asking for 3 numbers with those factors instead it asks for 3 numbers with both those factors.

I noticed that after I posted it, but thought it would be cheesy to just delete my post. I knew someone would call me on it. See.....you are very special.


phew, didnt wanan be in the wrong!



posted on Mar, 30 2007 @ 06:00 PM
link   
Kristol n Stauss, correct answer. Any answer under 1 minute is fairly good. Any correct answer around 1 second would qualify as a supercomputer brain. If you answer correctly in around 30 seconds, it does not necessarily mean that you do not have a supercomputer brain, just that your mind, like all human minds, does not always move in perfect order.

Impressive time, Kristol n Stauss!!!



posted on Mar, 30 2007 @ 06:05 PM
link   
618
927
309


15.8 sec

does that mean i am genious?



posted on Mar, 30 2007 @ 07:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by bodrul
does that mean i am genious?


Not if you can't spell it.



posted on Mar, 30 2007 @ 07:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by yeahright

Originally posted by bodrul
does that mean i am genious?


Not if you can't spell it.


i did that on purpose
just to show all genius have moments

did you buy that



posted on Mar, 30 2007 @ 08:36 PM
link   
Absolutely. I'm totally convinced.



posted on Mar, 30 2007 @ 09:32 PM
link   
All I got was 309 'cause I'm so lazy I just multiplied 3 & 103 together and thought I had my answer.

It's (almost) a weekend; I'm not doing any math!



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join