posted on Apr, 1 2007 @ 04:11 PM
Iason -
You bring up some of the more compelling arguments thus far - thanks. I could counter that by claiming that the very turmoil that wracked Judea in
the 1st century AD could be the very reason why there are very few 'independant' accounts of Christ's life. In the chaos of war and unrest, could
not the records have been destroyed.
I have enjoyed reading many of these posts. I am - as the astute reader has already discerned - a devout Roman Catholic. I am also a historian, and I
understand the sometimes contradictory nature of accepting things without evidence. That's why it's called faith.
We can argue about pre-Christian practices, religions, cults, practices, and beliefs forever. There is some validity to Christianity's practice of
'absorbing' local influences, beliefs, and practices. This incorporation is justified as a recognition of the locals seeing some aspect of God
despite not knowing him through the Gospel. Those who don't believe are more than welcome to look at that like a plate of tripe - fine by me. The
process of incorporation is one that I think reinforces the Hand of God moving throughout all the world and it's people.
Thanks all!