posted on Mar, 17 2007 @ 02:33 PM
Well, DF1, if this is how you intend to run your campaign, there's certainly no reason for me to try and stop you. By all means, continue to give
yourself a name as a belligerent troublemaker, and I wish you luck in that tactic. My personal opinion is that the average voter on ATS will require a
bit more from whom they wish to represent them, but you never know. Regardless of that, my opinion of you, while originally high, has suffered
considerably as a result of your repeatedly unneccesary attacks.
Additionally, I take serious insult at your implication that I would ever want any part of terrorism. While you are certainly entitled to your opinion
on any subject, you have no such right to make such a claim about me, and if you continue to state such libelous things against me, I will be forced
to file a complaint. I clearly stated, several times, what UTS stands for. If you are that illiterate, or that ignorant, that you cannot grasp the
reason I suggested United Top Secret, then you have no business being leader of anything, much less an educated crowd like ATS. To say nothing the
fact of how deeply you insult your fellow forum members by implying that they are terrorists.
I would appreciate an apology on your behalf for insulting ATS and me, though at the rate you're slipping into petty muckraking, I doubt one will be
forthcoming.
For everyone else who isn't DF1, and doesn't want to be associated with his rather insidious remarks about his fellow ATSers:
I'd like to know the general opinion on using "UTS" and "QFAC:" I consider this to be a lot more a group-oriented project than a competition,
and value the input of my fellow mature candidates in this venture. After all, it is up to us to get the rest of the ATS community interested in this
race, and to a degree, we'll have to work together to maket hat happen.