It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(PrisonPlanet)-Yet more archive news footage unearthed from broadcasts on 9/11 offers further evidence that the media were being fed a script in which a cover story was quickly groomed to offset questions about the highly suspicious collapse of the twin towers.
Yet more archive news footage unearthed from broadcasts on 9/11 offers further evidence that the media were being fed a script in which a cover story was quickly groomed to offset questions about the highly suspicious collapse of the twin towers.
Two weeks ago we highlighted BBC World footage from September 11 in which a correspondent reports the collapse of Building 7 as it remains standing in the live shot behind her head. New footage unearthed from Britain's Channel 5 news coverage provokes more questions about 9/11 scripting in a similar vein.
The suspicious rapidity of the instant press release aside, why did the World Trade Center's website carry such a blatantly fallacious explanation for the collapse of the first tower? Even the layman knows that any modern building is anchored by core columns, not "outside cladding," and the twin towers were no different. To rest a building's integrity on its "outside cladding" is a reversal of all commonly accepted architectural knowledge. Why was the World Trade Center website peddling this nonsense in contradiction with the words of the twin tower's own designers?
Why were senior State Department officials telling the media that there had been a bombing without even conducting a basic appraisal of the building's perimeter? Can this all be put down to "confusion" or were some elements of the 9/11 script changed according to how events were unfolding on the day?
The suspicious rapidity of the instant press release aside, why did the World Trade Center's website carry such a blatantly fallacious explanation for the collapse of the first tower? Even the layman knows that any modern building is anchored by core columns, not "outside cladding," and the twin towers were no different. To rest a building's integrity on its "outside cladding" is a reversal of all commonly accepted architectural knowledge. Why was the World Trade Center website peddling this nonsense in contradiction with the words of the twin tower's own designers?
Originally posted by Midwest Agenda
You have been registered here for over a year, right?
You amassed a nice sum of points, from posting quality work I assume, right?
Than why on gods green earth would you post ANYTHING from that dirty rag wannabe prison planet?
I think you would be better served to quote something form the national enquirer.
Just my MidWest take on the situation!
M.Agenda!
[edit on 12-3-2007 by Midwest Agenda]
Originally posted by Black_Fox
Hey i just report,you get to decide.
Stop trying to shoot the messenger.
Thank you.
Just my MidWest take on the situation!
M.Agenda!
Originally posted by sensfan
This is wrong..the WTC towers did use the outside structre as the main "anchor" and load bearer...that's a well known fact that prison planet is trying to make look unbelievable. Aparently they decided not to do any research.
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by sensfan
The suspicious rapidity of the instant press release aside, why did the World Trade Center's website carry such a blatantly fallacious explanation for the collapse of the first tower? Even the layman knows that any modern building is anchored by core columns, not "outside cladding," and the twin towers were no different. To rest a building's integrity on its "outside cladding" is a reversal of all commonly accepted architectural knowledge. Why was the World Trade Center website peddling this nonsense in contradiction with the words of the twin tower's own designers?
This is wrong..the WTC towers did use the outside structre as the main "anchor" and load bearer...that's a well known fact that prison planet is trying to make look unbelievable. Aparently they decided not to do any research.