It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cobra1982
Deny John Lear.
Originally posted by Ghost01
They came across no heavy security, and saw no secret saucer bases. There was nothing there. It was just a dry lake bed.
Originally posted by johnlear
Are you asking the forum to deny my existence, or is this just a reference to some of my thoughts? If its a reference to my thoughts I am wondering if it means ALL of my thoughts or just those about the Lockheed F-104?
Originally posted by johnlear
Are you asking the forum to deny my existence, ...
Originally posted by Deus_Brandon
Originally posted by Ghost01
They came across no heavy security, and saw no secret saucer bases. There was nothing there. It was just a dry lake bed.
Tim
You don't think that whenever they let them go across and believe you me they knew they were coming whether and hour or more before and it being a "SECRET BASE" (if there is such thing) do you not think that they would not have a way of covering up where they were ? It had to be below ground in the first place ... and the biggest thing I am seeing here is they did not come across .... "HEAVY" security ... of course What is Heavy security used for ... ONLY to protect .... Not to Guard something that is not suppose to be there .... Anyways ... just found that ... interesting .. Why would they find any kinda security at all ????
Originally posted by SocialistAgenda
Exactly! They might scatter a few guards around the area to be on look out but even that is not necessary! High tech sensors and cameras that are manned/observed from a remote location work just as well and don't allow for any clues!
Originally posted by Ghost01
Originally posted by SocialistAgenda
Exactly! They might scatter a few guards around the area to be on look out but even that is not necessary! High tech sensors and cameras that are manned/observed from a remote location work just as well and don't allow for any clues!
I would not agree completely to that. I think there is surveillance equipment
around the groom lake facility in all directions. Also the "normal" military
personell have no access to the base, so they also have to keep them away.
Originally posted by Ghost01
Papoose has no security at all:
NO Cameras
NO Gurads
NO Motion Sensors
No FLIR Devices
No Anything!
One of the more imaginative protest groups was Greenpeace. Not content to simply step across the line near the Mercury entrance, they organized and pulled off forays deep into the NTS. For one of these excursions, they decided to send a small party into the NTS on a multi-day trip from the east side, to come in the back way, so to speak. The group left from the National Desert Wildlife Range and proceeded northwest to the Test Site. In doing so, they crossed Papoose Lake itself. They came across no heavy security, and saw no secret saucer bases. There was nothing there
Then there is Caltech degree in "Electronic Technology", a degree which the school doesn't offer.
Originally posted by Ghost01
Here you are, I leave you to answer these question. Maybe they will shead some light in this mystery!
Tim
Originally posted by classified material
If they have doors built into the side of Papoose Mountain that really are sand texture coated, you won't see them on a crappy satellite image silly!
Originally posted by Cobra1982
S-4, is just Bob Lazar's fantasy.
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
Hey John,
Who's Dan? Would like to hear about his time spent out at S-4. Any links you can send me to or good threads?
About the camo doors. Can't a cheap thermal camera easily spot the temp difference between the hanger doors and surrounding mountain? I guess it depends on the range of the thermal cam. Are good ones capable of seeing the heat difference on the side of a mountain from a mile away. I'm asking cause I don't know.