It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WILHELM FRIED from Tulchva, Hungary
source: xroads.virginia.edu...
Wilhelm Fuchs from Tolcsva, Hungary
source: en.wikipedia.org...(producer)
"Baby William" from Tulchva, Hungary - No name change mentioned
source: www.fabulousfox.com...
WILHELM FRIED from Tulchva, Hungary
source: www.britannica.com...
Wilhelm Fuchs (lists the name Wilhelm Fried as Erroneous)
-------
"Somewhere along the way, Wilhelm's name was changed to William Fox, a direct English translation of his Germanic name"
source: www.whitenberg.de...
Originally posted by pepsi78
zero is not a number, zero=nothing.
one is the smallest number, because a number will always resemble a value.
Originally posted by 11Bravo
yeah, you are missing something.
Here is a hint.
Do Roman numerals have a zero?
Originally posted by LightWorker13
Either way...if they are incompetent or they are in on it, they DONT deserve to be in power, I think we can all agree on that, instead of arguing about the details...
People say Bush is evil, but when you say hes satanic, whoa, that crosses the line there buddy. Why?
Originally posted by Mechanic 32
Originally posted by Lexion
Since this deals with numerology, perhaps this is the wrong forum ?
I was thinking the same.
Not only for the reasons you have stated, but clearly Fox is the family name of the original founder. And not some name that was made up, to suit the agenda.
As I said before, perhaps his whole family tree is "in on it".
Rev 13:18 This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight , let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is 666
Originally posted by Mirthful Me
Where's the zero?
You can't have 1-9 and not "0."
Zero
But that would kind of mess up your chart... Wouldn't it?
The real conspiracy is how long will you bleat "FOX is 666" whilst ignoring the lack of a zero column in your chart.
Originally posted by billybob
zero isn't a number.
Originally posted by somedude
Originally posted by 11Bravo
yeah, you are missing something.
Here is a hint.
Do Roman numerals have a zero?
No, but what do Roman numerals have to do with this? And that still doesn't answer my question about how a number such as 202 would be calculated using this system.
Originally posted by LightWorker13
If you wanna believe this is all just some coincidence, that is marvelously fine with me.
I ask you, though, to look at the brouder picture. If you take these things in isolation, of course its gonna be "well thats just a coincidence!" but, if you take everything collectively, all the trash that is going around about our Elite, all the atrocities, all the lies, all the corruption, all the hidden cues to look for; Skull and bones, Bohemian Grove, Child prostitution, SRA cases (satanic ritual abuse), all the missing children, all of it, look at it all collectively, and ask yourself this: If our government and our so-called leaders are not in on this...than they have got to be the most incompetent bunch of fools to ever grace office to let all these things go on under their nose.
What do you think it is? Incompetence, or are they in on it? I would suggest the ladder...
[edit on 9-2-2007 by LightWorker13]
Originally posted by Think About IT
That FOX 666 chart does not prove anything. Who made up that chart anyway?
Originally posted by 11Bravo
Originally posted by Think About IT
That FOX 666 chart does not prove anything. Who made up that chart anyway?
I was gonna edit down your post and address some of your questions, but the more I went over it the more I realized two things.
Firstly That you obviously hadnt read the thread because the few questions you have are answered already.
Secondly I realized that you typed alot but said very little.
Im not sure think-about-it is a good name for you my friend.
Originally posted by 11Bravo
His whole family 'in on it'?
The reference made in the OP is that 666 equals Fox.
Revelation tells us about 666.
........
........
So you see, it is a MANS number.
A Name is passed down from generation to generation and sometimes, for various reasons, they change, but always they are honored and defended. Most men realize this. A mans name is his family history, but in a world that doesnt know its daddy I can understand the disassociation. Fuchs became Fox by choice. Fox is 666 using basic numerology.
666 is a mans number, and the number of the beast, and just like most things in the Bible, has multiple angles and applications.
It really is a pretty astounding book.
By the way, didnt it lose an X along the way?
Originally posted by LightWorker13
The Elite are heavy into the occult, remember, occult is not bad in itself all it means is "secret", but the Elite use it for negativity. They study numerology, and astrology, all the divination most people disregard as fantasty...they use symbols and patterns all the time, sacred geometry, esoteric knowledge and arts kept from the public.
Ive said it before, most people dont wanna believe it, that the NWO is SATANIC to its very core. Your Elite, which work for the NWO, are SATANIC TO THE CORE. And what is the main thing that Satan does? HE DECEIVES! HE LIES! HE PRETENDS TO BE GOOD, WHEN IN REALITY, HES EVIL!
FOX (666) News....you fit perfect.
Originally posted by LightWorker13
Can I offer any proof that the Elite are into occult and satanism?
Isnt FOX 666 proof enough?
What about the occult symbols hidden in the Washington street plan?
What about the occult symbols on the dollar bill?
What does it say? Novus Ordo Seclorum..."New Order of the Ages" another term the Elite use for the NEW WORLD ORDER.
If you look closely, you can see a tiny owl hidden on the top of the bill.
Of course there are all the satanic hand gestures they use, and incorporate in society thru entertainment, so people will think its cool and hip..
Coincidence? Or CONSPIRACY?
Originally posted by JackofBlades
Even if FOX is 666...... the number of the Beast is 616...
A bad translation a while back screws up your argument