Time out for a brief socio-political comment, plus some (hopefully) intriguing facts:
Until a few years ago, the notion of "parity" in the Women's NCAA Basketball Tourney was a bad joke. It seemed like every bracket was 1, 2, 3, 4
or 1, 2, 3, 5, going to the Sweet 16, and like the Final Four would have 3 #1 seeds and 1 #2 seed (if that). The men's tourney, meanwhile, was a
constant source of the kind of thrilling upsets which originally gave rise to the term "March Madness." The madness perhaps reached its apogee last
year, with George Mason impossibly making it to the Final Four.
And then there was this year. Below are the seeds which to date have survived each round of the men's and women's 2007 tourneys, respectively:
FIRST ROUND
MEN'S: East--1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9
WOMEN'S East--1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
MEN'S: Midwest--1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11
WMN'S: Midwest--1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13
MEN'S: South--1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9
WMN'S: South--1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9
MEN'S: West--1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11
WMN'S: West--1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11
Parity Edge: Women, narrowly
SECOND ROUND
MEN'S: East: 1, 2, 5, 6
WMN'S: East: 1, 3, 4, 7
MEN'S: Midwest: 1, 3, 5, 7
WMN'S: Midwest: 1, 3, 7, 13
MEN'S: South: 1, 2, 3, 5
WMN'S: South: 1, 2, 3, 5
MEN'S: West: 1, 2, 3, 4
WMN'S: West: 1, 3, 4, 10
Parity edge: Women, big
THIRD ROUND
MEN'S: East: 1, 2
WMN'S: East: 3, 4
MEN'S: Midwest: 1, 3
WMN'S: Midwest: 1, 7
MEN'S: South: 1, 2
WMN'S: South: 1, 2
MEN'S: West: 1, 2
WMN'S: West: 1, 3
Parity edge: Women, big
FOURTH ROUND (so far)
MEN'S: East: #2
WMN'S: East: #4
MEN'S: Midwest: #1
WMN'S: Midwest: #1 or #7
MEN'S: South: #1
WMN'S: South: #1 or #2
MEN'S: West: #2
WMN'S: West: #1 or #3
Parity edge: Women, slight-to-huge, depending on Tuesday night's games.
And for the 5 or 10 other forum users who, like me, have been closely watching both tourneys, I think you'll agree that for all of their turmoil
stemming from the egregious misconduct of a head coach who'd have been strung up if she were male, the #4-seeded LSU Tigers from the Eastern Bracket
look like the team to beat. They sure have the best player, from what I've seen. Moreover, though I sure don't expect it, the women's Final Four
could come down to a #2 seed, a #3 seed, a #4 seed and a #7 seed. Makes the men's 1/1/2/2 look pretty jejune by comparison, no?
I think we are observing a sea change in women's hoops. For the past 12 years, I've watched all kinds of girls from age 10 to age 17 practice their
games in their driveway, the way the more athletically gifted (not me) or taller (me) boys did, when I was young. One neighbor girl, who was 14 at
the time and 5'5", blew right by me for a layup starting from 15 feet out, with me playing 3 feet off of her. Yeah, I'm a fat, middle-aged slob
with no athleticism, but I'm also 6'2" and she got that shot up before I came close to blocking it.
The times they are a-changin'.
BHN