posted on Jan, 13 2007 @ 02:01 PM
the bloodlines are interesting, as power is mostly kept within those bloodlines and they can be traced very far back.
I can't say I ever thought much of the reptile stuff. I feel that david Icke made a mistake ever mentioning it in his lectures. He makes alot of very
interesting points, he has made alot of research and most of what he says is valid, but the reptile stuff seems to discredit him alot and has lost him
alot of support he may have otherwise have achieved. It is for Icke to decide what he will and won't say, what he feels is information we should all
be told. However he does admit himself he never saw any reptile or shapeshifter, he is simply reporting what many people have said to him, and he
heard the same thing so many times from different people who have never met each other, so I can very much understand why he thinks there is somethng
in it. Considering how many paedo's are in high positions of power and how there are murders, children missing etc and they come to a very terrible
end, there does seem to be something very inhuman about some of those implicated, so maybe he figured it tied in with reports of them being
shapeshifting reptiles. BUT he still admits he has no evidence of the shapeshifting reptiles himself, he was only reporting what other people have
alleged, and for this reason I think he should have avoided discussing it in public. He has enough other subjects to dicsuss about the NWO, and he has
concrete evidence of wrongdoings caused by them, so he should have concentrated on what he has evidence for, in my opinion.
In your case being distantly related doesn't really disprove his arguement either, it woud depend on which particular bloodline you are from, and I
am sure that not every single distant relation of every single supposedly "royal" family stands accused.