man's existence on earth

agree to disagree is probably the best policy
except on this point

wrong. graham hancock in particular has been involved in many archeological digs, dives and other ventures around the world. you of all people should know better than to assume anything. have you actually read any of his books?

Graham Hancock has never been on one archaeological dig
hes never gotten his hands that dirty
I have read all of his books posted at his forum and been in e mail contact with him
he describes himself as an anarchist who despises hierarchies and power structures
so there is the motivation for his claims that archaeologists are covering up the truth
I have not assumed anythging and I never post my assumptions
I actually Know

ok, then that makes hancock a liar.....as i too have been to his site and seen posts of his claims involving work on digs. but as i mentioned in the previous post, i dont have much respect for hancock's methods anyway.

agree to disagree it is.

as i too have been to his site and seen posts of his claims involving work on digs.

I'd love to read that
got any links ?

i searched the site after i posted, but havent found it as of yet......that was a couple of months before i joined ats, so at least a year and a half ago.