It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why should we trust Mini Ahmadi,
Originally posted by Low Orbit
Bodrul it isn't always about having Nukes, sometimes the bluff can be deadly enough
Originally posted by Low Orbit
depending on the context of the argument. You aren't Descartes and proof is not everything.
Originally posted by Low Orbit
If some leader especially a Muslim leader such as Ahmadi who has stated he wants to destroy Israel etc he should not be allowed to come anywhere near a nuke or its technology and nuclear power plants can often be a great spring board to a nuclear warhead program.
Originally posted by Low Orbit
Why should we trust Mini Ahmadi, what reason has he shown you that he doesn't mean any harm and that he is of good intentions? Any country that funds other terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah and Hamas are considered terrorist nations to me.
Originally posted by Low Orbit
Bodrul you are the kind of mate who pre world war 2 would of believed that Hitler and the others were never going to go to the UK and that Hitler's wars were only going to stay on Europe's mainland. If your country followed your brilliant advice, pre world war 2, you would all be speaking German now. Today, the battlefield is different than during ww2 and stakes are much higher due to nukes and other much more destructive technology.
Originally posted by Low Orbit
You need to take some history classes, because you don't know what you are talking about.
Originally posted by Wiz4769
The Point is they signed the treaty, they got certain liberties when they did. That is the reason why we should be able to check any and everywhere we need to check to keep them on the up and up. Thats right , that means if we decide to wake them up at 2am in their PJs and want to check their garage on a whim, thats the way it goes and they better cooperate or else
Originally posted by Wiz4769
If Iran was telling the truth and wanted to really make the US/UN look bad they could easily open up completly like they should have to and when nothing is found they can then say "told ya so" and go from there. Heck if they were smart they should have already done this and then started their little nuke program right after. But they are at worst tryin to bluff or "stand up"...now is not the time, thats a good way to get blown up IMO.
Originally posted by Wiz4769
And No I dont wish to see anyone blown up if it can be helped, BUT if they dont cooperate 100% in this matter and appear that they want to endanger ANYONE else in doing so, you must pay the price for doing so.
Originally posted by Wiz4769
If you keep making threats and tryin to bluff, sooner or later your gonna get called on it, the powers that be will not just let this go so dont even consider this an option at this point. Its really sad it got to this point, but now if Iran doesnt change their tune and try their hardest to resolve this, they will be the ones to pay and pay in full for this. And nobody else will be to blame but them, although many will try to pass the buck deep down everyone knows whos fault it really will be.
Originally posted by Wiz4769
The Point is they signed the treaty, they got certain liberties when they did.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Before invading other countries, you should kill the traitors inside your own country who are building a north american union and a police state.
I'll bet that comment results in an IP address trace and follow up surviellence.