ATLANTA, Georgia (AP) -- A purported first-century inscription naming Jesus may or may not be the real thing, but Israel's labeling of the find as a
fake is premature, scientists and scholars said at a panel discussion.
At issue is a limestone burial box, or ossuary, with the inscription "James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus," that emerged on Israel's antiquities
market last year.
That's really interesting, I remember watching a program disproving the authenticity of this box, but now that it's come back to light, I'd like to
see the outcome of the authenticity of the box now.
This has been debunked... I just read an article in Archeology magazine, and it also named one other artifact that was also faked by the owner...
The forgeries did fool some experts, but the evidence of the forgery was pretty convincing. Contrary to what many may think, I support the idea of
Jesus existing as a historical figure...and would have liked to see this be real...but alas, it is not.
Weird, I just read the article yesterday in the doc's office, and it is not a magazine I even knew existed. (I have since subscribed to it though)
You guys are psychic or something, hehe....
was it that its not really related to Jesus in history, or the age of it... or both ?
even if it's not related to Jesus in some way, I'd like to think that the age of it is correct, facinating that something can be around from that
time...