It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Jim Fetzer casts aspersions on my research regarding the use of thermates at the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001
which is fine as long as he provides serious technical objections, which he has not done...
At the same time, JF is promoting on the web site notions that energy-beams from WTC 7 or from space knocked the Towers down.
Fetzer's response: A classic example of the fallacy of accent occurs when the accused claims, "I didn't kill him. I paid someone else to do the shooting!" I have reams of evidence from the forum that Steve was patiently explaining to others how they could proceed to take control of the web site and even the society from me. He wants you to ignore his actual conduct, which was offensive, on the ground that he was merely offering advice about how it could be done and not pursuing power for himself...
Originally posted by talisman
Well many mormons (not my religion) are honest people, I don't think Steve Jones and his religious beliefs have anything to do with this. In the end we must judge his hypothesis which is based on science, he tries to use science to back some of what he is saying.
Originally posted by talisman
If Steve Jones has his theory shot down(on the WTC towers), it won't matter due to the fact there is one element that he has been bringing to the table again and again, namely Bld 7 and its demise. That can't be shot down in my view it was a clear example of a demolished building.
Originally posted by talisman
But with Fetzer, with Ray Beams from outer space or from Bldg 7. I agree if there is evidence show it, I am open minded. But that is just it, there is NO evidence for this. There might be some unexplained things that happened that day but certainly not what he is offering. That is just pure speculation.
If Fetzer and Ray Beams get shot down, well in my view there is tremendous damage done to the 9/11 movement. I think he knows the majority of americans are not going to take seriously Weapons from Space being used on the TWin Towers.
If evidence in his mind points to 'weapons from space' or anything like that then I think the evidence also points toward his direction. Namely he is purposely spilling Dis-Info.
Originally posted by talisman
But with Fetzer, with Ray Beams from outer space or from Bldg 7. I agree if there is evidence show it, I am open minded. But that is just it, there is NO evidence for this.
I would think a serious researcher of the case would be embarrassed NOT to be on Fetzer's "disinformation" list.
By 1996, I had lost all faith in [Fetzer's] integrity. He is a parasite, not a researcher. He tried to ride the medical evidence to fame, but was frustrated by his inability to use Harrison Livingstone. He went on to find others more easily manipulated, and picked Zapruder alteration as his new "cause."
For all of his talk of science, he told one researcher that he begins by deciding what is the truth, and then marshals evidence (selectively) to support that "truth." This is the opposite of scientific method. In my opinion, Fetzer is clearly a quack, using the language of his field to advance fraudulent premises.