posted on Nov, 27 2006 @ 11:26 AM
More of a question than an informative post ( at this moment ).
I started thinking of both Iraqi wars, and besides taking SH out of power and putting him behind bars, what makes this war so much different?In
respect to the way the situation has evolved to what it is today.
The Iraqi army was a very little obstacle and and the death tolls were much lower.
Why now is there apparently more fighting going on now, without an army, then previously when they had an army.
Did the freedom fighters & extremists just materialize from the 1rst war to the 2nd?
Or were they just waiting for another opportunity?
As I said, not much of an informative post rather an opinion finder.
Any thoughts on how things have changed so much between the two wars.
Did the support for SH grow after the first war?
( and yes, I know the circumstances to each war were different, but the outcomes should have been relatively the same IMO ).
edit for punctuation
[edit on 27-11-2006 by Grailkeeper]
[edit on 27-11-2006 by Grailkeeper]