posted on Dec, 22 2006 @ 05:59 AM
I think it's more for people who don't have a clue to this subject atall.
I send the link to a family member and she was surprized about the information.
I think it's good - and it made me cry cause it's so nicely done - that it could actually be used as a TV broadcast.
The reason it hit my emotions was of that reason - that it can reach a much larger amount of people who are use to watch TV where graphics are clean
and nice.
People who are use to the comfort of TV - Wont nessesary look at the raw video that people watch, who know about these things and search for
information of this kind. I thought to myself - "yes! they did it".
If you work with graphics and design - or have been working with web sites - you know it has an effect on the person watching it - If it looks nice
and clean - people will try actually look at the stuff presented - And not worry about the poor quality of the product.
Now that is art-work. And that is what I mean by "film history".
We have a nice car and a ugly car - They have the same engine - Which one you prefeer to own? That is more important than you might think.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That is also the reason some people disbelieve interviews done by a simple video recorder and bad sound equipment. Just because the video looks fuzzy
- does not mean it actually is a fake message being presented.
That is what makes the fastwalkers video special - cause it can reach the minds of people who normally would dismiss it at first look.