It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The death penalty in Iraq has to be carried out by hanging, according to the country's new constitution. However, Saddam has said he would rather face a firing squad.
Good. Saddam has been taken care of. Now only if someone also gave Bush the death sentence, we would be living in a better world.
Originally posted by Nicotine1982
Good. Saddam has been taken care of. Now only if someone also gave Bush the death sentence, we would be living in a better world.
That is one of the sickest, most ignorant things I think I have ever heard in these threads. "Good that a politically motivated mock-trial sentenced a man to die by hanging, now if only they would kill our President, the world would be a better place." WTF?!
Saddam was a ruthless and cruel dictator. But when a hoax of a trial sentences a man, ANY MAN, to die without letting the defence get a word in edgewise, there is a very serious problem.
George W. Bush is NOT a ruthless and cruel dictator, he is an ex-drug user who took a high level job and got in over his head, and has been manipulated by those around him. He is not, in spite of things, a cruel and heartless person, just incompetent and possibly senile. Do you believe people should be put to death for incompetence?
Originally posted by half_minded
Good. Saddam has been taken care of. Now only if someone also gave Bush the death sentence, we would be living in a better world.
Originally posted by Nicotine1982
Good. Saddam has been taken care of. Now only if someone also gave Bush the death sentence, we would be living in a better world.
That is one of the sickest, most ignorant things I think I have ever heard in these threads. "Good that a politically motivated mock-trial sentenced a man to die by hanging, now if only they would kill our President, the world would be a better place." WTF?!
Saddam was a ruthless and cruel dictator. But when a hoax of a trial sentences a man, ANY MAN, to die without letting the defence get a word in edgewise, there is a very serious problem.
George W. Bush is NOT a ruthless and cruel dictator, he is an ex-drug user who took a high level job and got in over his head, and has been manipulated by those around him. He is not, in spite of things, a cruel and heartless person, just incompetent and possibly senile. Do you believe people should be put to death for incompetence?
Originally posted by Pedro Sanchez
Most aren't aware, both Bush Senior and W are wanted for crimes against humanity by the UN, the only thing is the UN has no power of enforcement and no country has the balls to kidnap and try the president of the US or his father. Bush has ordered people to death in the same way saddam has. Saddam nor Bush killed themselves, they just order the military to do it.
Article Excerpt
Saddam's lawyer said the former president urged Iraqis "not to take revenge" on the US coalition and to "unify in the face of sectarian strike".
Originally posted by byhiniur
Alot of people have been saying the timing of this has been controlled by Bush.
How would he/anyone control it?
How will this benefit anyone other than the Iraqi people?