posted on Sep, 28 2006 @ 10:51 PM
I like how they claim that the primary piece of "evidence" in favor of WTC7 being a demo is Silverstein's quote. Just forget the fact that it fell
straight down at the speed of free fall into a neat pile, whereas no steel structure on Earth has ever totally collapsed from fire to begin with.
Of course only NIST is referenced for Towers 1 and 2. It's like NIST's significance to the official story is not what they say, but just the
fact that they tried to say something. And that something wasn't much, as they only attempted to explain how the collapses initiated.
Beyond the first floors to fail, nothing. How did the core fail? Nothing. How did the buildings fall all the way to their bases, without slowing?
Nothing. How was most of the mass ejected at the same time, primarily in four directions? Nothing. All their three-year report says is that they think
the first floors to fail could have failed from a few columns buckling on the perimeter on some of the highest floors.