It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by crowpruitt
Thats what puzzles me.If the steel was softened from the heat wouldn't the building topple?They both came straight down.And I emphasize BOTH.They came down in the same manner.Definitely strange.
Originally posted by billybob
x-ray?
what's the difference in the information gleaned from an xray vs. that gleaned from an ultrasound?
what would make an inspector choose one over the other?
more input would be cool.
Originally posted by Valhall
*excellent, detailed answer goes here*
Originally posted by billybob
i am hearing somewhere else that the perimeter steel was tempered steel, and more likely to fracture than bend, and that the core was mild steel, more likely to bend than fracture.
Originally posted by solidshot
Originally posted by billybob
i am hearing somewhere else that the perimeter steel was tempered steel, and more likely to fracture than bend, and that the core was mild steel, more likely to bend than fracture.
i believe the buildings were designed to flex in high winds? so it is probably doubtful that they used steal that would fracture rather than bend?