It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
From Rueters
Senior executives at General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co. have discussed a merger or alliance, industry newspaper Automotive News reported on Monday.
www.chron.com...
Executives of General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co. have discussed a possible merger or alliance, the trade journal Automotive News reported Monday. Both companies declined comment.
Automotive News quoted what it said were several people familiar with the talks as saying that discussions involving senior executives began in July and are not taking place now.
PROSPECT OF FOREIGN CONTROL OVER GM CAUSES STIR IN U.S.
ALLIANCE PROPSAL: Company votes to expore lin with Nissan, Renault.
DETROIT – It’s been said that what’s good for General Motors is good for the country.
But with a proposal now on the table to link the world’s largest automaker with Japan’s Nissan and France’s Renault, the question arises: which country?
Billionaire Kirk Kerkorian, who owns 9.9 percent of GM’s shares, is proposing that Renault SA and Nissan Motor co. each buy stakes in General Motors Corp. and add the American industrial icon to their existing alliance. Friday, GM’s board of directors voted to pursue “exploratory discussions” with Renault and Nissan.
The idea of foreign companies exerting control over GM doesn’t sit well with some U.S. politician, union leaders and admirers of the company. Their discomfort is compounded by the fact that the French state holds 15 percent of Renault.
“I’m in favour of Michigan wining. I’m in favour of jobs coming here and the concern is that if it’s controlled by businesses on another continent or other continents, that we may end up on the losing end,” Gov. Jennifer Granholm told reporters in Lansing.
www.chron.com...
The only way that i could see ford and gm together is if ford bought gm. what does gm have going for it?
Originally posted by Nygdan
They already control the market and cover up flaws and dangers.
The only way that i could see ford and gm together is if ford bought gm. what does gm have going for it?
A viable company??? This isn't a matter of 'whats better, a chevy or a ford', its a business deal between businessmen, who know more about stock options than dealer installed options.
Originally posted by Nygdan
As far as the cobalt goes, there used to be a chevy called the cavalier, it was a peice of garbage. The name was became so strongly associated with being crap, that when GM rolled out the new 'cavaliers', they changed the name to "Cobalt".
Rather than make a better car, they gave it a re-tooling and a new name.
This is, probably, the real reason why companies like GM and Ford are in unstable (though still completely dominant) positions and considering mergers between themselves.