It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Akareyon
Skipping through the first half of "The Clash of Cultures" by Samuel P. Huntington, you will find that very question answered with a clear "no". Cultures adapt to some foreign influences as long they fit into their world scheme, yet reject other parts of that culture. For example, drinking Coca Cola has nothing to do with your being buddhist, muslim or christian: as long as it tastes good, why not enjoy it?
Originally posted by Akareyon
Having a few sushi restaurants in New York doesn't equal "japanization" either
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
Why is American culture so seductive where countries, such as China, have to block US corporate influence?
Can you elaborate on this? Blocking US corporate influence in China is a form of economic protectionism - nothing to do with culture.
Communism is an ideology that seeks to establish a future classless,
stateless social organization, based upon common ownership of the
means of production and the absence of private property.
...
However, various offshoots of the Soviet (what critics call the 'Stalinist')
and Maoist interpretations of Marxism-Leninism comprise a particular
branch of communism that has the distinction of having been the primary
driving force for communism in world politics during most of the twentieth
(20th) century.
...
Karl Marx held that society could not be transformed from the capitalist
mode of production to the communist mode of production all at once,
but required a state transitional period which Marx described as the
revolutionary dictatorship of the proletariat.
The communist society Marx envisioned emerging from capitalism has
never been implemented, and it remains theoretical; Marx in fact comme-
nted very little on what Communist society would actually look like.
However, the term 'Communism', especially when the word is capitalized,
is often used to refer to the political and economic regimes under commu-
nist parties which claimed to embody the dictatorship of the proletariat.
Wikipedia Communism Article
Originally posted by iori_komei
Ok, well as I thought I can't find the site I first read about it on,
quick tip for everyone BOOKMARK LINKS!, yeah I did'nt do that,
so as I thought I'd have to, I'm falling back on the wikipedia article.
Communism is an ideology that seeks to establish a future classless,
stateless social organization, based upon common ownership of the
means of production and the absence of private property.
...
Wikipedia Communism Article
As we can see said in the article, true Communism, that being Karl Marx's
original idea, has never existed, and most likely never will under the
current greed society of the world.
Originally posted by iori_komei
It may have called itslef that, and heck the U.S. government and
media call it that, but true Communism is'nt actually a bad thing.
Originally posted by danwild6
Originally posted by iori_komei
It may have called itslef that, and heck the U.S. government and
media call it that, but true Communism is'nt actually a bad thing.
True, to bad its unattainable.